中国科技期刊研究 ›› 2022, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (6): 704-712. doi: 10.11946/cjstp.202202280121

• 科技期刊影响力提升策略研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

国内外科技期刊COVID-19高影响力论文分析对比及思考

史强()(), 卢珊, 徐秀玲, 安瑞   

  1. 《中国科学》杂志社,北京市东城区东黄城根北街16号 100717
  • 收稿日期:2022-02-28 修回日期:2022-05-13 出版日期:2022-06-15 发布日期:2022-08-01
  • 作者简介:史 强(ORCID:0000-0003-4271-7985),博士,副编审,E-mail: scichina_sq@163.com;
    卢 珊,博士,副编审;
    徐秀玲,博士,副编审;
    安 瑞,博士,编审。
  • 基金资助:
    2021年度中国科技期刊卓越行动计划选育高水平办刊人才子项目-青年人才支持项目“科技期刊如何在重大公共卫生事件中践行责任——以卓越行动计划入选期刊为例”(2021ZZ052613)

Comparison and analysis of high-impact papers on COVID-19 in scientific journals at home and abroad

SHI Qiang()(), LU Shan, XU Xiuling, AN Rui   

  1. Science China Press, 16 Donghuangchenggen North Street, Dongcheng District, Beijing 100717, China
  • Received:2022-02-28 Revised:2022-05-13 Online:2022-06-15 Published:2022-08-01

摘要:

【目的】 对国际及国内科技期刊COVID-19高影响力论文进行分析对比,为我国建设世界一流科技期刊提供参考。【方法】 通过文献信息搜集、可视化知识图谱分析等手段,对国际科技期刊及入选“中国科技期刊卓越行动计划”的我国科技期刊COVID-19高影响力论文特征进行分析,从多个方面对比差异,作出总结和思考。【结果】 以入选“中国科技期刊卓越行动计划”期刊为代表的我国科技期刊在COVID-19报道中有许多优秀表现,但与世界一流科技期刊相比,在学术影响力、栏目多样性、国际科技及大众媒体影响力、医学领域优质稿源竞争力等方面尚需进一步提升。【结论】 我国优秀科技期刊应对标世界一流科技期刊,不断补齐短板,为我国建设世界科技强国提供有力支撑。

关键词: 重大公共卫生事件, 高影响力论文, 中国科技期刊卓越行动计划, 比较分析, COVID-19

Abstract:

[Purposes] This paper aimed to analyze the high-impact papers on COVID-19 in scientific journals at home and aborad, and provide references for the construction of world-class scientific journals in China. [Methods] Through database retrieval, visualized knowledge map analysis, and other means, this paper analyzed the characteristics of high-impact papers on COVID-19 from foreign scientific journals and domestic scientific journals included in Excellence Action Plan for China's STM Journals. The comparison was made in multiple aspects, and a summary was given. [Findings] China's scientific journals, represented by those included in the Excellence Action Plan for China's STM Journals, have made excellent achievements in reporting COVID-19. However, compared with the world-class scientific journals, they are still required to further improve academic influence, diversity of columns, international scientific and mass media influence, and competitiveness of high-quality medical research papers. [Conclusions] Benchmarked with world-class scientific journals, China's excellent scientific journals should constantly make up for the shortcomings, so as to provide strong support for China's construction of scientific and technological powerhouse in the world.

Key words: Major public health event, High-impact paper, Excellence Action Plan for China's STM Journals, Comparative analysis, COVID-19