【目的】 调查我国学术期刊在重大突发事件中的反应速度、应变能力、数字化出版、研究内容和传播效果等。【方法】 以中国知网(China National Knowledge Infrastructure, CNKI)网络首发的新型冠状病毒肺炎(COVID-19)相关论文为对象,通过Phyth 3.6软件编写数据挖掘程序来获取发表论文及其期刊信息,应用Excel软件对数据进行统计分析。【结果】 2020年1月21日至2020年2月26日,共有146种中国学术期刊在CNKI平台以开放获取(Open Access,OA)形式出版COVID-19研究论文565篇,内容涉及疫情预测、疫情防控、临床诊治、病毒病理等;CNKI平台在整合传播过程中,影响力较大,效果显著,截至2020年2月27日,已有公开显示网络下载数据的460篇论文的总下载量为719485次,篇均下载量为1571次,下载超过5000次的论文有18篇,超过1000次的论文有228篇,占49.6%。【结论】 我国学术期刊在疫情防控期间主要存在整体上反应不够迅速、数字化出版能力不强、网络首发平台应用不充分、行动力区域性不平衡等问题,应加快推进期刊出版的数字化、集约化和整合传播。
[Purposes] This study aims to investigate the practice of Chinese academic journals in response to major emergencies, such as the reaction speed, adaptability, digital publishing, research content, and dissemination effects. [Methods] The papers published on CNKI platform themed around COVID-19 research were collected as survey objects. A data mining program written through Phyth 3.6 was used to obtain the publishing papers and their journal information, and Excel software was used for statistical analysis of the data. [Findings] During the period from January 21, 2020 to February 26, 2020, a total of 146 Chinese academic journals have published 565 COVID-19 research articles in the form of open access on CNKI platform, thematically covering epidemic prediction, epidemic prevention and control, clinical diagnosis and treatment, and viral pathology. The CNKI platform has a great influence and significant effect in the process of integration and dissemination. As of February 27, 2020, 460 papers with publicly downloaded data have been downloaded 719485 times, each of which has been downloaded 1571 times on average and 18 of which have been downloaded more than 5000 times. There are 228 papers downloaded more than 1000 times, accounting for 49.6%. [Conclusions] The academic journals in China have many problems in the epidemic prevention and control, e.g., the response speed to major public emergencies appears not fast enough, the digital publishing capacity remains not strong enough, and the application of online priority publication platform is inadequate, which lead to such issues as regional imbalances in driving forces. It is suggested that there are more efforts in demand for Chinese academic journals to accelerate the speeds of digitization, intensification, and integration of journal publishing.
Online priority publication,