[1] |
Danziger R S, Nordgren R K, Singh M,et al. Analysis of the editorial review process of the Journal of Molecular and Cellular Cardiology[J]. Journal of Molecular and Cellular Cardiology, 2018,114:124-128.
doi: 10.1016/j.yjmcc.2017.11.002
URL
pmid: 29122579
|
[2] |
Kravitz R L, Franks P, Feldman M D,et al. Editorial peer reviewers' recommendations at a general medical journal:Are they reliable and do editors care?[J]. PLoS ONE, 2010,5(4):e10072.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0010072
URL
pmid: 20386704
|
[3] |
White C. Little evidence for effectiveness of scientific peer review[J]. British Medical Journal, 2003,326(7383):241.
doi: 10.1136/bmj.326.7383.241/a
URL
pmid: 12560260
|
[4] |
Hopewell S, Collins G S, Boutron I,et al. Impact of peer review on reports of randomised trials published in open peer review journals:Retrospective before and after study[J]. British Medical Journal, 2014,349:g4145.
URL
pmid: 24986891
|
[5] |
Tvina A, Spellecy R, Palatnik A. Bias in the peer review process:Can we do better?[J]. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2019,133(6):1081-1083.
doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003260
URL
pmid: 31135720
|
[6] |
Gregory A T, Denniss A R. Everything you need to know about peer review:The good,the bad and the ugly[J]. Heart,Lung and Circulation, 2019,28(8):1148-1153.
|
[7] |
Rennie D. Let's make peer review scientific[J]. Nature, 2016,535(7610):31-33.
doi: 10.1038/535031a
URL
pmid: 27383970
|
[8] |
Saxe J P. Opening the black box of peer review[J]. Cell Stem Cell, 2019,24(6):843-848.
URL
pmid: 31173714
|
[9] |
张春丽, 商丽娜, 倪四秀. 科技期刊开放式同行评议模式探索[J]. 中国科技期刊研究, 2015,26(11):1151-1155.
|
[10] |
Yarris L M, Simpson D, Ilgen J S,et al. Team-based coaching approach to peer review:Sharing service and scholarship[J]. Journal of Graduate Medical Education, 2017,9(1):127-128.
URL
pmid: 28261408
|
[11] |
Nagler A, Ovitsh R, Dumenco L,et al. Communities of practice in peer review[J]. Academic Medicine, 2019,94(10):1437-1442.
URL
pmid: 31135399
|
[12] |
Richards B F, Cardell E M, Chow C J,et al. Discovering the benefits of group peer review of submitted manuscripts[J]. Teaching and Learning in Medicine, 2020,32(1):104-109.
URL
pmid: 31545096
|
[13] |
Ilgen J S, Artino A R, Simpson D,et al. Group peer review:The breakfast of champions[J]. Journal of Graduate Medical Education, 2016,8(5):646-649.
URL
pmid: 28018525
|
[14] |
Teachman G, Lévesque M C, Keboa M T,et al. Group peer review:Reflections on a model for teaching and learning qualitative inquiry[J]. International Review of Qualitative Research, 2018,11(4):452-466.
doi: 10.1525/irqr.2018.11.4.452
URL
|
[15] |
Elsevier. Experimenting with collaborative peer review[EB/OL].[2020-04-05]. https://www.elsevier.com/reviewers-update/story/innovation-in-publishing/experimenting-with-collaborative-peer-reviewhttps://www.elsevier.com/reviewers-update/story/innovation-in-publishing/experimenting-with-collaborative-peer-review.
|
[16] |
Frontiers. Collaborative peer review[EB/OL].[2020-03-31]. https://www.frontiersin.org/about/review-system.
URL
|
[17] |
Koshy K, Fowler A J, Gundogan B,et al. Peer review in scholarly publishing - part A:Why do it?[J]. International Journal of Surgery Oncology, 2018,3(2):e56.
|
[18] |
郭伟. 群审稿: 一种专家主动审稿模式的探索[J]. 编辑学报, 2018,30(3):222-226.
|
[19] |
陈勇, 陈晓峰, 郭伟, 等. 媒体融合背景下群审稿实施路径探索[J]. 编辑学报, 2019,31(4):366-368.
|
[20] |
程磊, 汪劼, 徐晶, 等. eLife期刊特点及其学术质量[J]. 中国科技期刊研究, 2015,26(3):244-251.
doi: 10.11946/cjstp.201501210074
URL
|
[21] |
刘丽萍, 刘春丽. eLife开放同行评审模式研究[J]. 中国科技期刊研究, 2019,30(9):949-955.
|
[22] |
马瀚青, 周小玲, 侯春梅, 等. 基于社交网络的同行评议新模式:基于Peerage of Science与Frontiers平台的案例研究[J]. 中国科技期刊研究, 2015,26(9):935-940.
|
[23] |
杨硕. JMIR平台创新出版实践及其启示[J]. 编辑学报, 2019,31(S2):113-119.
|
[24] |
Lahiri D . Perspective:The case for group review[EB/OL].[ 2020- 03- 31]. http://blogs.nature.com/peer-to-peer/2006/06/perspective_the_case_for_group.html.
URL
|
[25] |
Elsevier. Peer review innovations aiming to support science and reward reviewers[EB/OL].[2020-04-05]. https://www.elsevier.com/reviewers-update/story/innovation-in-publishing/elseviers-peer-review-innovations-aim-to-support-science-and-rew ard-reviewers.
URL
|
[26] |
Giordan M, Csikasz-Nagy A, Collings A M,et al. The effects of an editor serving as one of the reviewers during the peer-review process[J]. F1000 Research, 2016,5:683.
|
[27] |
Pulverer B, Lemberger T. Peer review beyond journals[J]. The EMBO Journal, 2019,38(23):e103998.
|
[28] |
Bruce R, Chauvin A, Trinquart L,et al. Impact of interventions to improve the quality of peer review of biomedical journals:A systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. BMC Medicine, 2016,14(1):1-16.
|
[29] |
Callaham M, McCulloch C. Longitudinal trends in the performance of scientific peer reviewers[J]. Annals of Emergency Medicine, 2011,57(2):141-148.
doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2010.07.027
URL
pmid: 21074894
|
[30] |
Wong V S. The examination of peer review and publication in neurology[J]. Journal of Child Neurology, 2010,25(10):1298-1301.
|
[31] |
Lubek J. The important role of the peer reviewer[J]. Oral Surgery,Oral Medicine,Oral Pathology and Oral Radiology, 2018,125(5):391-392.
|
[32] |
Masukume G, Grech V. The Lancet peer reviewers:Global pattern and distribution[J]. The Lancet, 2018,391(10140):2603-2604.
|
[33] |
Houry D, Green S, Callaham M. Does mentoring new peer reviewers improve review quality? A randomized trial[J]. BMC Medical Education, 2012,12(1):1-7.
|
[34] |
Vercellini P, Buggio L, Viganò P,et al. Peer review in medical journals:Beyond quality of reports towards transparency and public scrutiny of the process[J]. European Journal of Internal Medicine, 2016,31:15-19.
doi: 10.1016/j.ejim.2016.04.014
URL
pmid: 27129625
|
[35] |
Prager E M. The quest for transparent science:Open peer review[J]. Journal of Neuroscience Research, 2019,97(3):227.
doi: 10.1002/jnr.24369
URL
pmid: 30599079
|
[36] |
林松, 张婉博, 张维维. 同行评议中审稿人不当行为的探讨与防范[J]. 编辑学报, 2020,32(4):439-442.
|
[37] |
Picciotto M. Peer review week:Quality in peer review[J]. The Journal of Neuroscience, 2019,39(38):7452.
doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1987-19.2019
URL
pmid: 31534003
|
[38] |
Al-Khatib A, Teixeira da Silva J A. Is biomedical research protected from predatory reviewers?[J]. Science and Engineering Ethics, 2019,25(1):293-321.
doi: 10.1007/s11948-017-9964-5
URL
pmid: 28905258
|
[39] |
Severin A, Chataway J. Purposes of peer review: A qualitative study of stakeholder expectations and perceptions[J]. Learned Publishing,2020:leap.1336.
doi: 10.1087/20090408
URL
pmid: 20676358
|
[40] |
郭鲜花. 定稿会作为质量控制举措的探讨[J]. 中国科技期刊研究, 2014,25(1):159-160.
|