中国科技期刊研究 ›› 2020, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (11): 1289-1298. doi: 10.11946/cjstp.202004010325

• 论坛 • 上一篇    下一篇

开放科学背景下出版集团的开放出版政策转型与实践

陈新兰1,2)(), 顾立平1,2)(), 刘金亚1,2)   

  1. 1)中国科学院文献情报中心,北京市海淀区中关村北四环西路33号 100190
    2)中国科学院大学经济与管理学院图书情报与档案管理系,北京市海淀区中关村北四环西路33号 100190
  • 收稿日期:2020-04-01 修回日期:2020-07-26 出版日期:2020-11-15 发布日期:2020-11-15
  • 通讯作者: 顾立平 E-mail:chenxinlan@mail.las.ac.cn;gulp@mail.las.ac.cn
  • 作者简介:陈新兰(ORCID:0000-0001-6539-0693),硕士研究生,E-mail: chenxinlan@mail.las.ac.cn。|刘金亚,硕士研究生。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金“从开放获取到开放科学的国外相关政策研究”(L1824003)

Open publishing policy transformation and practice of publishing groups under the background of open science

CHEN Xinlan1,2)(), KU Liping1,2)(), LIU Jinya1,2)   

  1. 1) National Science Library, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 33 Beisihuan Xilu, Zhongguancun, Haidian District, Beijing 100190, China
    2) Department of Library, Information and Archives Management, School of Economics and Management, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 33 Beisihuan Xilu, Zhongguancun, Haidian District, Beijing 100190, China
  • Received:2020-04-01 Revised:2020-07-26 Online:2020-11-15 Published:2020-11-15
  • Contact: KU Liping E-mail:chenxinlan@mail.las.ac.cn;gulp@mail.las.ac.cn

摘要:

【目的】 为我国科技期刊发展和学术出版转型提供政策与实践参考。【方法】 通过网络调研和政策跟踪扫描的方法,综述国际四大出版集团在文献阅读与访问、论文发表与出版、与利益相关方合作,以及服务创新等方面的最新开放政策与实践。【结果】 各大出版集团通过与科研资助机构洽谈合作、大力拓展业务版图、发展新的开放获取模式和开发新的开放获取期刊来重新定义开放科学的方式。【结论】 我国科研主体应以集体形式与出版商谈判,同时加强对科研人员的宣传和交流,大力发展本土开放获取期刊,率先掌控数据权益,并持续关注与调研开放探索实践中的新挑战。

关键词: 出版集团, 开放获取, 政策综述, 科技期刊, 学术出版

Abstract:

[Purposes] This paper aims to provide policy and practice references for the development of scientific journals and the transformation of academic publishing in China. [Methods] Through internet surveys and policy tracking and scanning, this paper summarized the latest open policies and practices of four major international publishing groups in literature reading and accessing, article publication, cooperation with stakeholders, and service innovation. [Findings] The four major international publishing groups redefine the way of open science by negotiating and cooperating with scientific research funding agencies, vigorously expanding their business territory, developing new open access models, and developing new open access journals. [Conclusions] The main body of scientific research in China should negotiate with publishers in a collective form, strengthen the publicity to scientific researchers and communicate with them, vigorously develop local open access journals, take the lead in controlling data rights and interests, and continue to pay attention to and investigate new challenges in the practice of open access.

Key words: Publishing group, Open access, Policy review, Scientific journal, Academic publishing