中国科技期刊研究 ›› 2020, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (1): 32-38. doi: 10.11946/cjstp.201906250458

• 质量建设 • 上一篇    下一篇

加强栏目策划 提升学术影响力——基于中华医学会系列杂志Q1和Q4区间研究

彭芳1),金建华1),董燕萍1)(),王攀智1),杨扬1),贺月月2),李亭亭1)   

  1. 1) 浙江大学医学院附属第一医院期刊中心,浙江省杭州市庆春路79号 310003
    2) 浙江大学医学院附属第一医院《感染微生物与疾病》编辑部,浙江省杭州市庆春路79号 310003
  • 收稿日期:2019-06-25 修回日期:2019-12-15 出版日期:2020-01-15 发布日期:2020-01-15
  • 通讯作者: 董燕萍 E-mail:zyyydyp@126.com
  • 作者简介:彭 芳(ORCID:0000-0002-9692-400X),硕士,编辑,E-mail:philomenafang@zju.edu.cn|金建华,学士,期刊中心副主任|王攀智,学士,编辑|杨 扬,硕士,责任编辑|贺月月,硕士,助理编辑|李亭亭,硕士,编辑。
  • 基金资助:
    2018年度小编仁和基金(XBRH-2018-001-011)

Strengthen column selection to enhance the academic influence: Based on Chinese Medical Association series journals in Q1 and Q4 quartiles

PENG Fang1),JIN Jianhua1),DONG Yanping1)(),WANG Panzhi1),YANG Yang1),HE Yueyue2),LI Tingting1)   

  1. 1) Medical Journal Publishing Center, First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, 79 Qingchun Road, Hangzhou 310003, China
    2) Editorial Office of Infectious Microbes & Diseases, First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, 79 Qingchun Road, Hangzhou 310003, China
  • Received:2019-06-25 Revised:2019-12-15 Online:2020-01-15 Published:2020-01-15
  • Contact: DONG Yanping E-mail:zyyydyp@126.com

摘要:

【目的】 比较中华医学会主办的不同学术水平期刊的栏目设置和刊出率,探讨栏目策划对医学期刊学术影响力的影响。【方法】 以146本中华医学会系列杂志(纸刊)为研究对象,根据《中华医学会系列杂志学术质量审读报告》和《中国科技期刊引证报告(核心版)》数据,筛选出2015—2017年连续3年位于Q1区间且在各自学科领域排名第一的10种期刊作为研究组,同时筛选出连续3年均排在Q4区间的10种期刊作为对照组,比较两组期刊的栏目设置和刊出率。【结果】 两组期刊均有固定栏目,研究组期刊2015—2017年的栏目数量为16~25个,对照组为7~15个,且研究组高水平栏目、重点号、特色类栏目、临床病例讨论和导读栏目的刊出率均高于对照组期刊(P<0.05)。【结论】 增加栏目种类,丰富栏目内容,注重普及与提高相结合,是医学期刊提升学术影响力的重要举措。

关键词: 栏目策划, 学术影响力, 高水平栏目, 重点号, 特色栏目, 临床病例讨论, 导读, 中华医学会, 医学期刊

Abstract:

[Purposes] This paper aims to compare the column settings and publication rate of medical journals sponsored by Chinese Medical Association (CMA) with different academic levels, hoping to provide references for improving academic influence of medical journals. [Methods] A total of 146 CMA series journals (printed editions) were taken as research objects, which were grouped from Q1 to Q4 quartiles. According to the data from Academic Quality Review Report of CMA Series Journals and Citation Reports of Chinese Scientific and Technology Journals (Core Board), 10 journals that ranked first in their respective discipline areas in Q1 quartile from 2015 to 2017 were selected as the research group. Meanwhile, 10 journals ranked in Q4 quartile from 2015 to 2017 were selected as the control group. The types of columns and publication rate in the two groups were compared. [Findings] Both groups have fixed columns. There are 16-25 columns in the research group and 7-15 columns in the control group from 2015 to 2017. Moreover, the publication rates of high-level column, key planning column, characteristic column, clinical case discussion, and guide column in the research group are higher than those in the control group. [Conclusions] It is an important measure to improve the academic influence of medical journals by increasing the number of columns, enriching the contents of columns, and paying attention to combination of popularization and improvement.

Key words: Column selection, Academic influence, High-level column, Key planning column, Characteristic column, Clinical case discussion, Guide column, Chinese Medical Association, Medical journal