【目的】 比较中华医学会主办的不同学术水平期刊的栏目设置和刊出率,探讨栏目策划对医学期刊学术影响力的影响。【方法】 以146本中华医学会系列杂志(纸刊)为研究对象,根据《中华医学会系列杂志学术质量审读报告》和《中国科技期刊引证报告(核心版)》数据,筛选出2015—2017年连续3年位于Q1区间且在各自学科领域排名第一的10种期刊作为研究组,同时筛选出连续3年均排在Q4区间的10种期刊作为对照组,比较两组期刊的栏目设置和刊出率。【结果】 两组期刊均有固定栏目,研究组期刊2015—2017年的栏目数量为16~25个,对照组为7~15个,且研究组高水平栏目、重点号、特色类栏目、临床病例讨论和导读栏目的刊出率均高于对照组期刊(P<0.05)。【结论】 增加栏目种类,丰富栏目内容,注重普及与提高相结合,是医学期刊提升学术影响力的重要举措。
[Purposes] This paper aims to compare the column settings and publication rate of medical journals sponsored by Chinese Medical Association (CMA) with different academic levels, hoping to provide references for improving academic influence of medical journals. [Methods] A total of 146 CMA series journals (printed editions) were taken as research objects, which were grouped from Q1 to Q4 quartiles. According to the data from Academic Quality Review Report of CMA Series Journals and Citation Reports of Chinese Scientific and Technology Journals (Core Board), 10 journals that ranked first in their respective discipline areas in Q1 quartile from 2015 to 2017 were selected as the research group. Meanwhile, 10 journals ranked in Q4 quartile from 2015 to 2017 were selected as the control group. The types of columns and publication rate in the two groups were compared. [Findings] Both groups have fixed columns. There are 16-25 columns in the research group and 7-15 columns in the control group from 2015 to 2017. Moreover, the publication rates of high-level column, key planning column, characteristic column, clinical case discussion, and guide column in the research group are higher than those in the control group. [Conclusions] It is an important measure to improve the academic influence of medical journals by increasing the number of columns, enriching the contents of columns, and paying attention to combination of popularization and improvement.
Key planning column,
Clinical case discussion,
Chinese Medical Association,