中国科技期刊研究 ›› 2016, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (1): 18-24. doi: 10.11946/cjstp.201511071058

• • 上一篇    下一篇

开放评议与双盲评议在国际科技期刊质量控制中的价值

常唯1),李自乐1),王成2),郭宸孜1),李耀彪1),马健1),王淑平1),张光1),白雨虹1)   

  1. 1) 中国科学院长春光学精密机械与物理研究所,吉林长春东南湖大路3888号 130033
    2) 苏州生物医学工程技术研究所,苏州高新科技城科灵路88号 215163
  • 收稿日期:2015-11-07 修回日期:2015-12-18 出版日期:2016-01-20 发布日期:2016-01-15
  • 作者简介:常 唯(ORCID:0000-0002-6142-200X),博士,副研究馆员。|李自乐,硕士,工程师。|王 成,博士,研究员。|郭宸孜,硕士,助理工程师。|李耀彪,博士,副研究员。|马 健,博士,高级工程师。|王淑平,硕士,副编审。|张 光,博士,副研究员。|白雨虹,博士,研究员。
  • 基金资助:
    中国科学院自然科学期刊编辑研究会“同行评议可检验规范最佳实践指南研究”项目资助(YJH2014-02)

The value of open peer review and double-blind peer review in the quality control of international scientific journals

CHANG Wei1),LI Zile1),WANG Cheng2),GUO Chenzi1),LI Yaobiao1),MA Jian1),WANG Shuping1),ZHANG Guang1),BAI Yuhong1)   

  1. 1) Changchun Institute of Optics, Fine Mechanics and Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences.3888 Dongnanhu Road, Changchun 130033,China
    2) Suzhou Institute of Biomedical Engineering and Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 88 Keling Road, SND, Suzhou 215163,China
  • Received:2015-11-07 Revised:2015-12-18 Online:2016-01-20 Published:2016-01-15

摘要:

【目的】了解国际科技期刊在开放评议和双盲评议方面的实践,探索这两种评议方式的优缺点及对科技期刊质量控制的价值。【方法】对国际科技期刊实行开放评议和双盲评议的案例进行调研,如BMC系列期刊、F1000Research、Nature系列期刊等。【结果】有越来越多的期刊在尝试这两种方式,它们在减少传统单盲评议的偏见方面发挥了一定作用,但也带来了新的问题。【结论】开放评议和双盲评议适合于不同类型的期刊。期刊应根据自身的学科特点、学术定位来选择适合自己的同行评议方式,并在实践中不断评估,对之进行适当的调整。

关键词: 同行评议, 开放评议, 双盲评议, 国际科技期刊

Abstract:

[Purposes] The paper aims to learn the practices of open peer review and double-blind peer review in international scientific journals,seek their prosandcons as well as the practice value.[Methods] This paper investigated and analyzed journals which used open peer review and double-blind peer review, such as BMC journals, F1000Research, Nature journals.[Findings] A t present,more and more journals choose one of them as their peer review model.Bias and some other issues in single-blind peer review have been overcome to some extent by the use of them,but some new problems may come.[Conclusions] Open peer review and double-blind peer review are suitable for journals w ith different characteristics.Journals should select proper peer review type which is suitable,and adjust it in the practice.

Key words: Peer review, Open peer review, Double-blind peer review, International scientific journal