中国科技期刊研究 ›› 2015, Vol. 26 ›› Issue (6): 634-638. doi: 10.11946/cjstp.201502050139

• • 上一篇    下一篇

医学期刊基金论文比与影响因子等指标的关系及影响因素

王谦1,林萍1,孙昌朋2,陈望忠2()   

  1. 1. 南方医科大学人文与管理学院,广州市白云区沙太南路1023号 510515
    2. 《南方医科大学学报》编辑部,广州市白云区沙太南路1023号 510515
  • 出版日期:2015-06-15 发布日期:2015-06-15
  • 作者简介:王谦(ORCID:0000-0003-1718-2173),硕士研究生,E-mail:775824996@qq.com

The relationship and influencing factors ofmedical journals'funding ratio,im pact factor,and other evaluation indexes

WANG Qian1,LIN Ping1,SUN Changpeng2,CHEN Wangzhong2()   

  1. 1. College of Humanities & Management,Southern Medical University,1023 Shatai Nanlu,Guangzhou 510515,China
    2. Editorial Department of Journal of Southern Medical University,1023 Shatai Nanlu,Guangzhou 510515,China
  • Online:2015-06-15 Published:2015-06-15

摘要: 目的 分析医学期刊基金论文比与影响因子等指标的相关关系。方法 选取2011年版《中文核心期刊要目总览》中数量最多的6类医学期刊(共152种)为研究对象,以2011-2014年版《中国科技期刊引证报告(核心版)》为数据来源,将两年基金论文比和影响因子等指标作为分析对象,进行Spearman相关分析。结果 该6类期刊的两年基金论文比与影响因子并无显著相关性(P值均大于0.05)。基金论文比与其他期刊评价指标也不完全有相关性。结论 基金论文比不适合作为国内期刊评价的重要指标,办刊人和期刊评价体系应该科学理性地看待基金论文比。

关键词: 医学期刊, 基金论文比, 影响因子, 客观因素, 人为因素

Abstract:

[Purpose] This paper aims atanalyzing the relationship betweenmedical journals'funding ratio,impact factor,and other evaluation indexes.[Methodology] The largest number of medical journals in six categories were selected as the object of this study.Based on 2011-2014 Chinese Scientific and Technical Journal Citation Report(core version)for data sources.This study took two years funding ratio and impact factor,and other evaluation indexes as analysis indicators for Spearman correlation.[Findings] There is no significant correlation of the six kinds of journals'two years funding ratio and impact factor(p >0.05),funding ratio and other evaluation indexes are not completely correlated.[Conclusions] Funding ratio is not suitable as an important indicator of the domestic journal evaluation.We'd better take it into account rationally.

Key words: Medical journals, Funding ratio, Impact factor, Objective factors, Human factors