摘要: 目的 分析医学期刊基金论文比与影响因子等指标的相关关系。方法 选取2011年版《中文核心期刊要目总览》中数量最多的6类医学期刊(共152种)为研究对象,以2011-2014年版《中国科技期刊引证报告(核心版)》为数据来源,将两年基金论文比和影响因子等指标作为分析对象,进行Spearman相关分析。结果 该6类期刊的两年基金论文比与影响因子并无显著相关性(P值均大于0.05)。基金论文比与其他期刊评价指标也不完全有相关性。结论 基金论文比不适合作为国内期刊评价的重要指标,办刊人和期刊评价体系应该科学理性地看待基金论文比。
关键词:
医学期刊,
基金论文比,
影响因子,
客观因素,
人为因素
Abstract:
[Purpose] This paper aims atanalyzing the relationship betweenmedical journals'funding ratio,impact factor,and other evaluation indexes.[Methodology] The largest number of medical journals in six categories were selected as the object of this study.Based on 2011-2014 Chinese Scientific and Technical Journal Citation Report(core version)for data sources.This study took two years funding ratio and impact factor,and other evaluation indexes as analysis indicators for Spearman correlation.[Findings] There is no significant correlation of the six kinds of journals'two years funding ratio and impact factor(p >0.05),funding ratio and other evaluation indexes are not completely correlated.[Conclusions] Funding ratio is not suitable as an important indicator of the domestic journal evaluation.We'd better take it into account rationally.
Key words:
Medical journals,
Funding ratio,
Impact factor,
Objective factors,
Human factors
王谦,林萍,孙昌朋,陈望忠. 医学期刊基金论文比与影响因子等指标的关系及影响因素[J]. 中国科技期刊研究, 2015, 26(6): 634-638.
WANG Qian,LIN Ping,SUN Changpeng,CHEN Wangzhong. The relationship and influencing factors ofmedical journals'funding ratio,im pact factor,and other evaluation indexes[J]. Chinese Journal of Scientific and Technical Periodicals, 2015, 26(6): 634-638.