中国科技期刊研究 ›› 2019, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (4): 404-409.doi: 10.11946/cjstp.201811291055

• 能力建设 • 上一篇    下一篇

专题编辑参与中文科技期刊稿件处理的实践与思考

杨洪星1,何卓铭1,)2),宋梅梅1,)2),张浩佳1),丁文强1),马沂1,2,王晓峰1,)2),杨蕾1,)2)   

  1. 1)《中国激光》杂志社有限公司,上海市嘉定区清河路390号 201800
    2) 中国科学院上海光学精密机械研究所,上海市嘉定区清河路390号 201800
  • 收稿日期:2018-11-29 修回日期:2019-01-18 出版日期:2019-04-28 发布日期:2019-04-15
  • 作者简介:杨洪星(ORCID:0000-0002-4528-7020),硕士,编辑,E-mail: yanghongxing@siom.ac.cn|何卓铭,硕士,编辑|宋梅梅,硕士,编辑|张浩佳,博士,编辑|丁文强,学士,助理工程师|马 沂,硕士,副编审|王晓峰,博士,编审|杨 蕾,硕士,编审。

Practice and thought of manuscript processing by topical editors for Chinese scientific journals

YANG Hongxing1,HE Zhuoming1,)2),SONG Meimei1,)2),ZHANG Haojia1),DING Wenqiang1),MA Yi1,2,WANG Xiaofeng1,)2),YANG Lei1,)2)   

  1. 1) Chinese Laser Press, 390 Qinghe Road, Jiading District, Shanghai 201800, China
    2) Shanghai Institute of Optics and Fine Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 390 Qinghe Road, Jiading District, Shanghai 201800, China
  • Received:2018-11-29 Revised:2019-01-18 Online:2019-04-28 Published:2019-04-15

摘要:

目的 总结《光学学报》采用专题编辑(Topical Editor, TE)送审稿件的经验,为科技期刊提高学术质量提供参考。方法 依据严格的标准遴选了22位TE,并将传统审稿流程中的编辑送审改为TE送审。根据研究方向从2017年7月至2018年6月的来稿中挑选459篇交由TE送审。从稿件送审数量、平均外审周期、审稿意见等方面评价TE送审模式的实施效果。结果 TE可以精准地送审稿件,提高期刊学术质量,节省编辑时间。结论 TE送审可以进一步提高中文科技期刊的学术质量。

关键词: 中文科技期刊, 同行评议, 专题编辑, 学术质量

Abstract:

[Purposes] This paper aims to summarize the experience of manuscript review assignment by topical editors (TEs) in Acta Optica Sinica, and provide reference for scientific journals to improve academic quality. [Methods] Twenty-two TEs were selected with high standards, and handled the peer review process of 459 manuscripts from July 2017 to June 2018. Their work was evaluated by the number of manuscripts, average period of peer review, review comment, and so on. [Findings] TEs can accurately assign the manuscript review, improve the publishing quality, and save the editors' time. [Conclusions] TEs can help editors improve the publishing quality, so it is worthy of manuscript review assignment by TEs for Chinese scientific journals.

Key words: Chinese scientific journal, Peer review, Topical editor, Academic quality