中国科技期刊研究 ›› 2025, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (8): 1007-1015. doi: 10.11946/cjstp.202505210529

• AIGC治理专题 • 上一篇    下一篇

我国医学期刊人工智能生成内容伦理规范构建现状及审查制度完善策略

鞠翠钰()(), 江雨莲, 孙激, 杨洋()()   

  1. 四川大学华西第二医院《中华医学遗传学杂志》编辑部,出生缺陷与相关妇儿疾病教育部重点实验室,四川省成都市武侯区人民南路三段20号  610041
  • 收稿日期:2025-05-21 修回日期:2025-07-15 出版日期:2025-08-25 发布日期:2025-09-08
  • 通讯作者: 杨 洋(ORCID:0000-0003-1000-3750),硕士,编辑,E-mail:172582277@qq.com
  • 作者简介:
    鞠翠钰(ORCID:0009-0008-3514-6882),硕士,助理编辑,E-mail:
    江雨莲,硕士,副编审
    孙 激,学士,编审,编辑部主任。
    作者贡献声明: 鞠翠钰:拟定研究思路,设计研究方案,收集、核对、分析研究数据,撰写与修订论文; 江雨莲:指导研究设计,参与修订论文; 孙 激:指导研究设计,指导论文修订; 杨 洋:提出研究思路,设计研究方案,指导论文修订。
  • 基金资助:
    四川省社会科学重点研究基地四川学术成果分析与应用研究中心资助科研项目“四川期刊发展研究专项”(XSCG21QK-009)

Current status and strategies for improving the ethical guidelines and review system of artificial intelligence generated content in medical journals

JU Cuiyu()(), JIANG Yulian, SUN Ji, YANG Yang()()   

  1. Key Laboratory of Birth Defects and Related Diseases of Women and Children (Sichuan University),Ministry of Education,Editorial Office of Chinese Journal of Medical Genetics,West China Second University Hospital,Sichuan University,20 Section 3,South Renmin Road,Wuhou District,Chengdu 610041,China
  • Received:2025-05-21 Revised:2025-07-15 Online:2025-08-25 Published:2025-09-08

摘要:

目的 探讨我国医学期刊官网中对人工智能生成内容(artificial intelligence generated content,AIGC)伦理规范构建现状,并提出AIGC伦理审查制度完善策略。 方法 选取《科技期刊世界影响力指数(WJCI)报告(2024版)》中遴选的421种医学期刊为研究对象,检索各期刊官网,调查其对AIGC伦理规范要求情况。 结果 在纳入的421种医学期刊中,仅100种(23.8%)对AIGC伦理规范提出具体要求,凸显整体伦理意识薄弱。不同语种、第一主办单位、数据库收录(类别与数量)期刊AIGC伦理规范要求差异较大,中文期刊伦理规范建设滞后于英文期刊。各刊针对AIGC伦理规范的表述在范围界定、披露要求与署名政策方面不清晰、不统一,对AIGC伦理审查制度建设不够重视。 结论 我国医学期刊应加强AIGC伦理规范构建力度,通过“政策规制+技术保障+责任声明”三位一体方案,强化编辑培训,重视官网建设,从而促进AIGC伦理审查制度完善。

关键词: 医学期刊, 人工智能生成内容, 伦理规范, 策略

Abstract:

Purposes To explore the current status of ethical guidelines regarding artificial intelligence generated content (AIGC) on the official websites of Chinese medical journals, and propose strategies for improving the ethical review system of AIGC. Methods A total of 421 medical and health journals indexed in the World Journal Clout Index(WJCI)of Scientific and Technological Periodicals(2024) were included in the study. The official websites of these journals were reviewed to assess the ethical guidelines requirements regarding AIGC. Findings Among the 421 medical journals included in this study, only 100 (23.8%) had established specific ethical requirements for AIGC, highlighting a pervasive lack of awareness of ethics. There were significant differences in the ethical guidelines requirements for AIGC across journals with different publication languages, primary sponsors, and indexing databases (categories and quantities). The development of ethics in Chinese-language journals is less developed than that of English-language journals. The statements regarding AIGC ethical guidelines in these journals are unclear in terms of scope definition, disclosure requirements, and authorship policies, indicating a lack of adequate attention to the establishment of ethical review systems for AIGC. Conclusions Chinese medical journals should enhance the supervision of AIGC ethical guidelines by implementing a trinity framework of “policy regulation + technical safeguards + accountability statements”, and bolstering editorial training, prioritizing official website development, thereby facilitating the establishment of comprehensive review systems for AIGC ethics.

Key words: Medical journals, Artificial intelligence generated content, Ethical guidelines, Strategy