摘要：

【目的】调查日本医学期刊的利益冲突报道政策现状,为我国医学期刊提供参考。【方法】以日本医学会期刊在官网公布的利益冲突指南、规章、制度,以及征稿启示、稿件要求、投稿须知、重要提示等文本、文件中的利益冲突报道相关表述为分析材料,对各期刊的利益冲突分类、报道程序、报道要求、处理方法等项目进行叙述性统计。【结果】131种期刊都有覆盖作者、编委、编辑、审稿专家等编辑出版流程各主体的利益冲突报道政策,且明确提出了各主体报道利益冲突的类型、报道方式以及处理方法。日本医学期刊的利益冲突报道政策已与国际主流接轨,也在报道尺度、冲突规避、信息保护上体现出对本国医学研究、实践的尊重。【结论】我国医学期刊应公开利益冲突报道信息,完善报道政策,并注重原则性与操作性的结合。

关键词: 日本医学会, 医学期刊, 利益冲突报道, 报道政策

Abstract:

[Purposes] To investigate the status quo of conflict of interest disclosure policies in Japanese medical journals and to provide a reference for medical journals in China. [Methods] The conflict of interest guidelines, regulations and systems, as well as expressions related to conflict of interest disclosure in documents such as the call for manuscripts, manuscript requirements, submission instructions, important reminders, and the review process published on the official websites of 131 journals of Japanese Association of Medical Sciences(JAMS)were used as the material for analysis, then conducted narrative statistics on items such as the classification of conflict of interest, the disclosure process, disclosure requirements, and the handling methods of the journals. [Findings] All 131 journals of JAMS have conflict of interest disclosure policies on their official websites that can cover all subjects of the entire publication process. The conflict of interest disclosure policies of Japanese medical journals have been brought into line with the international mainstream, and also show respect for medical research and practice in Japan in terms of disclosure scale, conflict avoidance, and information protection. [Conclusions] Medical journals in China should enhance the awareness of conflict of interest disclosure, improve conflict of interest disclosure policies and pay attention to the combination of applicability and principle.

Key words: Japanese Association of Medical Sciences, Medical journals, Conflict of interest disclosure, Disclosure policies