中国科技期刊研究 ›› 2025, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (10): 1418-1425. doi: 10.11946/cjstp.202506140669

• • 上一篇    下一篇

国内管理学重要期刊的撤稿管理规范与学术生态协同建设

高杰1)()(), 张涵2)()(), 杨中军3), 张武1), 许可1)   

  1. 1) 山东大学国际创新转化学院,山东省青岛市即墨区滨海路72号 266237
    2) 中国科学院科技战略咨询研究院,北京市海淀区中关村北一条15号 100190
    3) 山东大学齐鲁医院(青岛),山东省青岛市市北区合肥路758号 266035
  • 收稿日期:2025-06-14 修回日期:2025-09-26 出版日期:2025-10-25 发布日期:2025-11-14
  • 作者简介:

    高 杰(ORCID:0000-0002-1945-3048),博士,长聘副教授,E-mail:

    杨中军,博士,副教授

    张 武,博士,助理研究员

    许 可,博士,长聘副教授。

    作者贡献声明: 高 杰:设计研究方案,论文撰写与修订; 张 涵:设计研究思路框架,论文指导与修订; 杨中军:调研访谈,数据整合; 张 武:论文撰写与修订; 许 可:数据处理,论文修改。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目“面向资助效能分析展示的政策研究综合数据支撑方法及模块设计研究”(L2324128); 国家自然科学基金项目“原创探索计划项目资助成效研究”(J2324005)

Withdrawal management morms and academic ecology collaborative construction of domestic important management journals

GAO Jie1)()(), ZHANG Han2)()(), YANG Zhongjun3), ZHANG Wu1), XU Ke1)   

  1. 1) School of Innovation & Entrepreneurship,Shandong University,72 Binhai Road,Jimo District,Qingdao 266237,China
    2) Research Institute of Science and Technology Strategy,Chinese Academy of Sciences,15 Zhongguancun Beiyitiao,Haidian District,Beijing 100190,China
    3) Qilu Hospital (Qingdao),Cheeloo College of Medicine,Shandong University,758 Hefei Road,Shibei District,Qingdao 266035,China
  • Received:2025-06-14 Revised:2025-09-26 Online:2025-10-25 Published:2025-11-14

摘要:

目的 分析国内管理学重要期刊撤稿管理与学术规范建设现状,为科技期刊与科学基金的学术规范建设提供对策建议。 方法 以国家自然科学基金(NSFC)管理科学部认定的30种国内管理学重要期刊为研究对象,借助文本分析等方法,展开对期刊撤稿相关信息的检索整合与文本分析。 结果 国内管理学期刊的学术不端现象多为“涉嫌抄袭”“重复率高”“一稿多投”“重复发表”,但撤稿量与“AI率”较高等情况也在增加;管理学期刊的撤稿管理规范建设程度不一,还有提升空间。 结论 国内管理学重要期刊的撤稿管理与学术规范建设逐步完善,还需加强与科技管理部门、学术共同体的联动融合,构建学术生态协同体系,提升科研诚信与学术声誉。

关键词: 撤稿管理, 学术不端, 自然科学基金, 学术规范, 管理学期刊, 可视化分析

Abstract:

Purposes This paper analyzes the current situation of manuscript withdrawal management and academic norm construction of important management journals in China, and provides countermeasures and suggestions for the academic norm construction of sci-tech journals and science funds. Methods Taking 30 important domestic management journals recognized by the Management Science Department of the National Natural Science Foundation (NSFC) as the research objects, with the help of text analysis and other methods, the retrieval, integration and text analysis of information related to journal retraction were carried out. Findings Most of the academic misconduct in domestic management journals are “suspected plagiarism” “high repetition rate” “multiple manuscripts submitted” and “repeated publication”, but the number of manuscripts withdrawn and high AI rate are also increasing. The construction of management norms for manuscript withdrawal of management journals varies, and there is still room for improvement. Conclusions The management of withdrawing manuscripts and the construction of academic norms of important domestic management journals are gradually improved, and it is necessary to strengthen the linkage and integration with scientific and technological management departments and academic communities, build an academic ecological collaborative system, and enhance scientific research integrity and academic reputation.

Key words: Withdrawal management, Academic misconduct, Natural science fund, Academic norm, Management journal, Visual analysis