摘要：

【目的】 探讨审稿人行使学术话语权过程中存在的问题与障碍,探索审稿人学术话语权的提升策略,为优化同行评议机制提供参考。【方法】 系统梳理审稿流程,厘清各主体权利与义务,建立审稿人学术话语权运行机制模型,针对审稿人学术话语权行使现状提出优化策略。【结果】 所提模型可有效模拟理想状态下的同行评议流程,为深入考察不同参与者争取学术话语权的博弈过程提供清晰视角,也为寻找提升审稿人学术话语权的策略提供契机。【结论】 规范的同行评议流程和完善的激励机制可为审稿人行使学术话语权提供更好的保障,推动形成良好的学术生态,促进学术繁荣。

关键词: 审稿人, 同行评议, 学术话语权, 学术共同体, 期刊编委会

Abstract:

[Purposes] This paper aims to explore the problems and obstacles in the process of exercising the reviewers' academic discourse rights and the enhancement strategies, so as to provide a reference for optimizing the peer review mechanism. [Methods] This paper systematically sorted out the review process, clarified the rights and obligations of each subject, established a model for the operation mechanism of reviewers' academic discourse rights, and proposed optimization strategies for the current situation of reviewers' academic discourse rights. [Findings] The model proposed in this paper can effectively simulate the peer review process under the ideal state, which provides a clear perspective for the in-depth examination of the game process of different players competing for academic discourse rights and provides an opportunity to find strategies to enhance the academic discourse right of reviewers. [Conclusions] The establishment of a standardized peer review process and a perfect incentive mechanism can provide better protection for reviewers to exercise their academic discourse rights, accelerate the formation of a sound academic ecology, and promote academic prosperity.

Key words: Reviewer, Peer review, Academic discourse right, Academic community, Journal editorial board