中国科技期刊研究 ›› 2021, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (7): 851-858. doi: 10.11946/cjstp.202103160236

• 质量建设 • 上一篇    下一篇

我国科技期刊当前标准体系现状分析及国际相关进展

郑春雨(), 王利鹏, 陈婕*()   

  1. 中国医科大学中国实用医学杂志社,辽宁省沈阳市和平区南京南街9号 110001
  • 收稿日期:2021-03-16 修回日期:2021-05-20 出版日期:2021-07-15 发布日期:2021-07-15
  • 通讯作者: 陈婕 E-mail:147509892@163.com;ek23866419@163.com
  • 作者简介:郑春雨(ORCID:0000-0002-0915-0617),硕士,编辑,E-mail: 147509892@163.com|王利鹏,学士,编辑
  • 基金资助:
    辽宁省科技厅公益基金软科学研究项目“应用网络平台,对中文科技期刊标准化执行现状的调研及建议”

Current standards for China scientific journals and related international progress

ZHENG Chunyu(), WANG Lipeng, CHEN Jie*()   

  1. Department of Chinese Journals of Practical Medicine, China Medical University, 9 South Nanjing Street, Heping District, Shenyang 110001, China
  • Received:2021-03-16 Revised:2021-05-20 Online:2021-07-15 Published:2021-07-15
  • Contact: CHEN Jie E-mail:147509892@163.com;ek23866419@163.com

摘要:

【目的】 对国内外近年来科技期刊标准体系及相关进展进行梳理,结合我国国家标准(GB)现状,分析现存问题。【方法】 检索2010—2021年国内外权威机构有关期刊部分的最新标准,针对我国科技期刊国家标准执行现状分析不足,并提出对策和建议。【结果】 国际组织制定的科技期刊标准呈不断细化、专业、高效、精准的趋势。我国科技期刊国家标准仍存在标准的制定不够精准,标准的更新不够与时俱进,标准的执行强度不够,标准不统一,缺少针对汉语种特异性强的国家标准,标准映射存在障碍等问题。针对以上问题,需要从以下几个方面入手解决:进行系统的顶层设计,广泛采集基础资料进行整合、更新现有国家标准,增加新型国家标准,制定特异性强的科技期刊国家标准等。【结论】 比对国际组织发布的标准,我国现存国家标准不够精细和完善,科技期刊标准的完善还有大量的基础工作需要完成。

关键词: 标准, 国际标准化组织, 国际电工委员会, 美国国家标准化机构, 英国标准学会, 科技期刊

Abstract:

[Purposes] This paper analyzes the standards for scientific journals in China and abroad in recent years and summarizes the problems in the national standards of China. [Methods] The standards for journals released by authoritative institutions in China and abroad from 2010 to 2021 were retrieved and problems of the current national standards in China were expounded. On this basis, suggestions were put forward. [Findings] International standards tend to be detailed, professional, efficient, and targeted, while the Chinese standards fail to be targeted, keep pace with the times, be well implemented, be unified, and Chinese language-specific. In light of the above problems, efforts should be made to strengthen top-level design and integrate and update current standards for the development of scientific journals-specific national standards. [Conclusions] Compared with international standards, the current standards for scientific journals in China should be further detailed and improved, for which a great deal of basic work is needed.

Key words: Standard, International Organization for Standardization, International Electrotechnical Commission, American National Standards Institute, British Standards Institution, Scientific journal