[Purposes]This paper aims to reveal the value, forms and basic requirements of the reasonable show ing of expert reviewers'comments in scientific papers,and provide a reference for its depth exploitation.[Methods]The author fully collected some examples from scientific journals, and referred to some researches, analyzed and compared thesematerials by review ing and summarizing them.[Findings]It is not common for the published expert reviewers'comments in papery journals.They aremainly distributed in the footnotes and endnotes of the paper, almost not in the main body of the paper.In the form of expression, they were generally expressing thankfulness mostly,and rarely specifically described the expert reviewers'comments and the author'processing.[Conclusions]The reasonable show ing of expert reviewers'comments is feasible and necessary.It can form new academ ic standards to popularize and promote them,promote the reviewers'normalization,improve themechanism of peer review,improve the academ ic level of the journals in all aspects,and promote academic prosperity.
Published in paper,