中国科技期刊研究 ›› 2015, Vol. 26 ›› Issue (3): 281-285. doi: 10.11946/cjstp.201412151195

• 质量建设 • 上一篇    下一篇

中华医学会系列杂志质控标准探析

潘伟1,游苏宁1,2   

  1. 1 中华医学会杂志社总编室,北京东四西大街42号 100710
    2 中华医学会继续教育部,北京东四西大街42号 100710
  • 收稿日期:2014-12-01 修回日期:2015-01-11 出版日期:2015-03-15 发布日期:2015-03-15
  • 作者简介:潘 伟(ORCID:0000-0002-7352-3123),大学本科,编审,《中华妇产科杂志》副总编辑,E-mail: panwei@cma.otg.cn

Quality control standard analysis of Chinese M edical Association journals

PAN W ei1,YOU Suning1,2   

  1. 1 Chinese Medical Association Editor Office,42 Dongsi Xidajie,Beijing 100710,China
    2 Chinese Medical Association Division of Continuing Education,42 Dongsi Xidajie,Beijing 100710,China
  • Received:2014-12-01 Revised:2015-01-11 Online:2015-03-15 Published:2015-03-15

摘要:

目的 强化科技期刊质量管理,解读中华医学会系列杂志质控标准。方法 对中华医学会杂志社有关审稿、编校和出版质量控制标准的核心内容进行解读,并以《中华妇产科杂志》为例,对学术和编辑加工质量控制进行细化分析。结果 提出科技期刊必须恪守科技道德和国家新闻出版的相关法律、法规;以同行评议和三审五定作为严把学术质量的重要手段;将编辑规范落实到论文的编辑加工、排版流程、刊出后检查各环节。结论 同行评议、三审五定是科技期刊学术质量的有效保障;严格执行编辑规范、坚持出刊后质检对规范期刊编辑出版质量有重要意义。

关键词: 科技期刊, 学术质量, 编辑规范, 质量控制

Abstract:

[Purpose] Strengthening themanagementof sci-tech periodical quality and interpretation of the quality control standard of Chinese Medical Association journal.[Methodology] The core content of quality control standards about review ing,redaction and publishing for the Publishing House of Chinese Medical Association were interpretated.As a case study of the Chinese Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology,detailed analysis was carried out on the academic and editing processing quality control.[Findings] Sci-tech periodicalsmust adhere to science and technology ethics and THE national press and publication laws and regulations.Scitech periodicals should do peer review and 3 reriews(editorial department,peer-review and sem inar)5 discussions(editor,editor in charge,managing director,editor-in-chief,chief of the staff)as an importantmeans of strict academ ic quality;Sci-tech periodicals should implement editing specification into paper editing,typesetting process and checking after publication.[Conclusions] Peerreviewed and 3 reviews 5 discussions were effective guarantee to the academ ic quality of sci-tech periodicals,the strict editorial standard and the quality inspection after publication was of great significance.

Key words: Sci-tech periodicals, Academ ic quality, Editorial standard, Quality control