摘要:
【目的】 探讨出版深度融合下科技期刊新媒体编辑的职业认同及发展路径,为全面促进新媒体编辑的发展提供思路。【方法】 运用文献调查、概念分析、历史研究、比较研究、演绎等方法,从概念界定、职业认同演进、政策激励、评价制度改革、人才队伍建设以及新媒体编辑自我提升等方面研究科技期刊新媒体编辑的职业认同及发展途径。【结果】 科技期刊新媒体编辑职业认同及发展可通过以下路径得以实现:定义新媒体编辑,界定岗位职责和工作对象;依据《中华人民共和国职业分类大典》和职业标准谋求政策确认,使新媒体编辑职业得到认同;通过职称评审制度改革、人才队伍建设、业绩评价体系改革、人才培养与使用的有效衔接,以及“三个坚守”与“三个突破”自我素质提升等全方位、多途径地推动科技期刊新媒体编辑职业发展。【结论】 受传统出版思维的局限,科技期刊新媒体编辑作为出版融合发展过程中产生的新职业,其职业概念和定位尚未明确,地位和待遇与其他编辑不平等,这不利于国家出版融合战略的实施。目前科技期刊新媒体编辑职业逐渐得到认同,但其职业发展尚需进一步加强。
关键词:
新媒体编辑,
科技期刊,
政策激励,
评价制度,
人才队伍建设,
职业发展,
职业认同
Abstract:
[Purposes] This paper aims to explore the professional identity and development path of new media editors of scientific journals under the background of deep integration of publishing, thus providing ideas for comprehensively promoting the development of new media editors. [Methods] Using the methods of literature survey, concept analysis, historical research, comparative research, deduction, etc., this paper studied the professional identity and development path of new media editors of scientific journals from the aspects of concept definition, professional identity evolution, policy incentives, evaluation system reform, talent team construction, and self-promotion of editors. [Findings] The professional identity and development of new media editors of scientific journals can be achieved through the following paths. The definition of new media editor should be clarified, with clear position responsibilities and work objects. The policy confirmation from The Occupational Classification Code of the People's Republic of China Occupational Classification Canon and occupational standards should be achieved, so that the new media editing profession can be recognized. The professional development of new media editors of scientific journals should be promoted in an all-round way through the reform of the professional title evaluation system, the construction of talent teams, the promotion of the performance evaluation system, the effective connection between talent training and use, and the improvement of self-quality from "three insistences" and "three breakthroughs". [Conclusions] Limited by traditional publishing thinking, the new media editor of scientific journals, as a new profession generated in the process of publishing integration development, has not yet defined its professional concept and orientation. Its status and treatment are not equal to other editors, which is not conducive to the implementation of the national strategy of publishing integration. At present, the professional status of new media editors of scientific journals has been recognized, but professional development needs to be further strengthened.
Key words:
New media editor,
Scientific journal,
Policy incentive,
Evaluation system,
Talent team construction,
Professional development,
Professional identity
谢文亮, 孙涛, 翟欣, 冯婷, 刘壮. 科技期刊新媒体编辑职业发展路径研究[J]. 中国科技期刊研究, 2023, 34(2): 203-211.
XIE Wenliang, SUN Tao, ZHAI Xin, FENG Ting, LIU Zhuang. Professional development path of new media editors of scientific journals[J]. Chinese Journal of Scientific and Technical Periodicals, 2023, 34(2): 203-211.