摘要：

【目的】探讨体育学术期刊中通信作者的署名问题,分析存在问题的原因,探寻体育学术期刊通信作者署名规范化的方法与路径,助力体育学科发展。【方法】采用逻辑分析法和案例分析法对43种体育学术期刊2022年第1期发表文章的通信作者标注情况进行分析。【结果】体育学术期刊通信作者标注率为34.18%,署名信息、作者身份、相关贡献等方面存在问题。体育学术期刊尚未就通信作者署名形成共识,未对通信作者建立标注审核机制,未建立体育学术科研评价机制,未确立科研诚信监督体系。【结论】体育学术期刊应就通信作者署名形成共识,体育学术期刊编辑部需要建立严格的标注审核机制,体育科研机构应进一步改革通信作者评价机制,与学术期刊编辑部一起确立科研诚信监督体系,以促进体育学科论文通信作者署名规范化。

关键词: 通信作者, 体育学术期刊, 署名规范, 不当署名

Abstract:

[Purposes] This paper explores the method and path for standardization of the signature of corresponding authors in sports academic journals by reviewing the signature of corresponding authors in sports academic journals and analyzing the reasons for the problems, aiming to promote the development of the sports discipline. [Methods] We employed logical analysis and case analysis to study the labeling of corresponding authors publishing papers on issue 1 of 43 sports academic journals in 2022. [Findings] The labeling rate of corresponding authors of sports academic journals is 34.18%, and there are problems in signature information, author identity, relevant contributions, etc. Sports academic journals have not reached a consensus on the signature of corresponding authors. Furthermore, the journals have not established a labeling mechanism for corresponding authors, a disciplinary system for research integrity, or a mechanism for evaluating sports research. [Conclusions] The academic community of sports academic journals should reach a consensus on the signature of corresponding authors. The editorial departments of the journals should establish a strict labeling and review mechanism. Sports research institutions should reform the evaluation mechanism of corresponding authors and cooperate with the editorial departments to establish a disciplinary system for research integrity to promote the standardization of the signature of corresponding authors of sports academic papers.

Key words: Corresponding author, Sports academic journal, Signature standardization, Inappropriate authorship