摘要：

【目的】 探究稿件初检后学术不端检测比例超限(20%~40%)情况下最优的选稿方法。【方法】 将运用稿件中的主要关键词查询得到的文献、学术不端检测软件检测稿件得到的来源文献、第一作者和通信作者及其学术团队的历史文献中与稿件相似度较高的文献与稿件主要内容及文后参考文献进行比对,查证稿件的创新性及文献引用的合理性。【结果】 部分学术不端检测复制比超限稿件是由作者的写作不规范、引用不当、参考文献著录错误、学术不端检测软件的缺陷等造成的,经过规范化修改,仍然属于可选的好稿件。【结论】 对学术不端检测软件的文字复制比例为20%~40%,且复制内容不属于论文核心部分的稿件,只需要进行文献溯源分析、核心内容创新性分析、行文写作规范性分析,从中依然可筛选到一定比例的好论文。这部分论文可以退给作者适当修改后即可进入专家审稿流程。

关键词: 稿件, 学术不端, 学术不端检测系统, 复制比, 稿件筛选

Abstract:

[Purposes] This paper aims to explore the optimal method for selecting manuscripts when the proportion of academic misconduct detection exceeds the limit (20%-40%) after the initial inspection. [Methods] The manuscript is compared with the documents obtained by querying the main keywords in the manuscripts, source documents obtained by the academic misconduct detection software, the main contents of the documents and manuscripts that are highly similar to the manuscripts in the historical literatures of the first author and corresponding author and their academic team, and the references at the end of this manuscript to verify the innovation of the manuscript and the rationality of the literature citations. [Findings] Some manuscripts with excessive academic misconduct ratio still belong to optional manuscripts after standardized modification due to the author's non-standard writing, improper citations, wrong bibliography description, defects of academic misconduct detection software, and other reasons.[Conclusions] Through the literature traceability analysis, the innovation analysis of the core contents, and the normative analysis of writing, some optimal manuscripts can be selected from the manuscripts whose text copy ratio from academic misconduct detection software is 20% to 40% and the replication content does not belong to the core part of the paper. These manuscripts can be returned to the author for appropriate modification before entering the expert review process.

Key words: Manuscript, Academic misconduct, Academic misconduct detection system, Copy ratio, Manuscript screening