中国科技期刊研究 ›› 2020, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (2): 223-228. doi: 10.11946/cjstp.201909140632

• 评价与分析 • 上一篇    

ORCID在我国学术期刊中的应用现状及启示

潘秋岑,苏俊宏,张立新,白婕静,张超,肖晨   

  1. 《西安工业大学学报》编辑部,陕西省西安市未央区学府中路2号 710021
  • 收稿日期:2019-09-14 修回日期:2019-12-26 出版日期:2020-02-15 发布日期:2020-02-15
  • 作者简介:潘秋岑(ORCID:0000-0001-9019-1610),硕士,编辑,E-mail: 405245156@qq.com|苏俊宏,博士,教授|张立新,硕士,副主编|白婕静,学士,研究员级高级工程师|张 超,硕士,讲师|肖 晨,硕士,助理编辑。
  • 基金资助:
    西安工业大学校长基金(XAGDXJJ18022)

Application status and enlightenment of ORCID marking in Chinese academic journals

PAN Qiucen,SU Junhong,ZHANG Lixin,BAI Jiejing,ZHANG Chao,XIAO Chen   

  1. Editorial Office of Journal of Xi'an Technological University, 2 Middle Xuefu Road, Weiyang District, Xi'an 710021, China
  • Received:2019-09-14 Revised:2019-12-26 Online:2020-02-15 Published:2020-02-15

摘要:

【目的】 寻找我国学术期刊关于ORCID注册和应用中存在的问题并提出有效解决方案,充分发挥ORCID对学术期刊的作用,以及普及ORCID在科研中的应用。【方法】 调查分析我国学术期刊的ORCID注册、标注、解析及采编系统集成情况,总结其应用过程中存在的问题,并提出我国学术期刊应用ORCID的发展方向。【结果】 学术期刊作者登记ORCID的意识较薄弱,分享成果意愿不强烈;作者注册信息不够规范,缺乏专门机构和人员的审查和验证;作者ORCID信息更新不及时,录入不完整;缺乏对所有作者ORCID主页的高效解析追踪;ORCID应用的宣传和推广力度远远不够。【结论】 学术期刊应加大资金投入,积极建立学术科研标准,在采编系统中积极嵌入ORCID服务平台;利用ORCID的优势,努力做好作者和审稿专家ORCID注册和录入信息规范化及解析准确化等方面的工作;与其他研究机构展开广泛合作,加大ORCID的宣传和推广力度,促进学术出版生态的健康有序发展,推进学术期刊网络化、数字化和国际化。

关键词: ORCID, 身份识别, 标识符, 学术期刊, 作者, 科研人员

Abstract:

[Purposes] This paper aims to find out the problems existing in the registration and application of ORCID in Chinese academic journals, propose effective solutions, give full play to the role of ORCID in academic journals, and popularize the application of ORCID in scientific research. [Methods] This paper investigated and analyzed the registration, annotation, analysis, and integration of the ORCID in Chinese academic journals, summarized the existing problems in the application process, and put forward the development direction of the application of ORCID in Chinese academic journals. [Findings] The consciousness of authors to register ORCID is weak, and their willingness to share results is not strong. The registration information of author is not standardized enough and lack of review and verification by specialized agencies and personnel. The author's ORCID information is not updated in time, and the entry is incomplete. The home page of ORCID is lack of efficient analysis and tracking. The publicity and promotion of ORCID application is far from enough. [Conclusions] Academic journals should increase capital investment, actively establish academic research standards, and actively embed ORCID service platform in the collection and editing system. Making use of the advantages of ORCID, academic journals should strive to do well in the work of ORCID registration, information input standardization, and analysis accuracy of authors and reviewers. We should cooperate extensively with other research institutions, increase the publicity and promotion of ORCID, promote the healthy and orderly development of academic publishing ecology, and promote the networking, digitalization, and internationalization of academic journals.

Key words: ORCID, Identity recognition, Identifier, Academic journal, Author, Scientific researcher