【目的】 对比国内高被引论文在国外的被引情况与国外高被引论文在国内的被引情况,探讨二者的相关性,以了解国内外高被引论文的差异。【方法】 选择2017年《中国科技期刊引证报告(核心版)》医药大学学报类综合评价总分排名前5位的期刊,选取2008—2017年各期刊在CNKI中的高被引论文共512篇及WoS中高被引论文共486篇,统计分析所选文献的被引频次等相关指标。【结果】 5种期刊的CNKI高被引论文的被引频次差异较小,而WoS高被引论文的被引频次差异较大;CNKI高被引论文的被引频次远高于WoS高被引论文的被引频次;除《南方医科大学学报》外,CNKI/WoS高被引论文的被引频次与其在WoS/CNKI中的被引频次的差异不具有统计学意义(P>0.05)。【结论】 我国5种国内学术影响力较高的医药大学学报的国际影响力均较低,这些期刊国内/外高被引论文的被引频次与其在国外/内的被引频次之间的相关性均不明显,国内外对5种期刊的引用存在差异。
[Purposes] In order to find the discrepancy of the highly cited articles in domestic and foreign databases, this study compares the foreign citation of the highly cited articles in domestic database and the domestic citation of the highly cited articles in foreign databases so as to explore the correlation between them. [Methods] Five journals with the highest comprehensive evaluation score in the category of medical university journals from Chinese S&T Journal Citation Reports in 2017 were included, and 512 articles with the highest citation frequency in CNKI database and 486 articles in Web of Science (WoS) database from 2008 to 2017 were selected and their citation frequencies were analyzed. [Findings] There exists a small citation frequency gap among those highly cited articles for these 5 journals in CNKI database, which is more obvious in WoS database. The citation frequencies of highly cited articles in CNKI database are significantly higher than those in WoS database. Except for Journal of Southern Medical University, there exists no significant correlation (P>0.05) between the citation frequencies of highly cited articles from CNKI/WoS database and those in WoS/CNKI database. [Conclusions] The domestic influence of these 5 medical university journals in China is high, while their international influence is relatively low. Highly cited articles in domestic databases do not necessarily get highly cited in foreign databases, and vice versa. Therefore, there is a citation difference between domestic and foreign databases.
Medical university journal,
Highly cited article,