【目的】 挖掘高校科技期刊审稿人审稿数量的分布规律,提出基于审稿人细分群体特征的优化措施及建议。 【方法】 从期刊网站调取审稿人审稿数据(截至2018-05-20),分析其分布规律,同时参考部分调查结果,提出有针对性的审稿人队伍建设措施。 【结果】 审稿数量居前的审稿人符合二八定律,审稿数量少的审稿人则具有典型的“长尾”特征。审稿数量居前20%的人审稿周期较短,审稿逾期的也较少。 【结论】 针对具有不同特征的审稿人群体,应采取不同的维护措施,以优化审稿人队伍,提高审稿质量。
[Purposes] This paper aims to explore the distribution law of the review number of reviewers of scientific journals sponsored by universities, and propose optimization measures and suggestions based on the characteristics of reviewers. [Methods] The reviewer's review data (as of 2018-05-20) was obtained from the journal website to explore the rules. At the same time, we referenced some of the results of the questionnaire survey to propose construction measures for targeted reviewer team. [Finding] The review with the highest number of reviewers is in compliance with the Pareto's principle, and the reviewers with a small review number have the typical long tail characteristics. The top 20% of the reviewers have shorter review process and fewer review deadlines. [Conclusions] We should adopt different maintenance measures for reviewer groups with different characteristics to optimize the reviewer team and improve the quality of review.
Scientific journal sponsored by university,
Long tail theory,