中国科技期刊研究 ›› 2017, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (9): 821-826. doi: 10.11946/cjstp.201706260515

• 质量建设 • 上一篇    下一篇

编辑出版类期刊参考文献著录现状分析

侯集体   

  1. 鲁东大学校报编辑部,山东省烟台市芝罘区红旗中路186号 264025
  • 收稿日期:2017-06-26 修回日期:2017-08-07 出版日期:2017-09-15 发布日期:2017-09-15
  • 作者简介:侯集体(ORCID:0000-0002-7295-890X),硕士,编审,鲁东大学校报主编,E-mail:houjiti@163.com。

Status analysis of reference citations in editing and publishing journals

HOU Jiti   

  1. Editorial Office of Ludong University News, 186 Middle Hongqi Road, Zhifu District, Yantai 264025, China
  • Received:2017-06-26 Revised:2017-08-07 Online:2017-09-15 Published:2017-09-15

摘要:

【目的】 分析编辑出版类期刊参考文献著录现状,为参考文献的规范著录和期刊质量的提升提供参考。【方法】 对照GB/T 7714—2015新标准,通过资料对比分析,采用数理统计法,以中文社会科学引文索引收录的6种编辑出版类期刊为调查对象,统计分析2017年第1期论文的参考文献著录情况。【结果】 各期刊执行标准的情况不一致,在个人著者(尤其是欧美著者)、引文页码、顺序编码、电子文献等方面存在著录不规范问题。【结论】 要重视参考文献著录工作,执行新标准,规范参考文献著录,以期提高期刊质量,打造精品学术期刊。

关键词: 编辑出版类期刊, 参考文献, 著录规范

Abstract:

[Purposes] This study aims to analyze the current situation of reference citations in editing and publishing journals to provide reference for regulating reference description and improving journal quality. [Methods] Based on the new standard GB/T 7714—2015, the reference citations for all papers in No.1 2017 of six editing and publishing journals indexed in CSSCI were analyzed with the help of mathematical-statistic method. [Findings] Different journals use different standards. The authors (especially European and American authors), citation page numbers, sequential coding, electronic literatures are cited in incorrect ways. [Conclusions] Reference citations should be put on agenda. New standards must be popularized and strictly implemented in an effort to improve the journal quality and to build high-quality academic journals.

Key words: Editing and publishing journal, Reference, Citation standard