【目的】科技期刊中的述评类综述凝聚了某一学科的研究进展、最新研究成果、潜在问题和未来发展趋势,文献价值举足轻重、学术地位不可代替,作者和办刊者需要注重述评类综述的学术质量。【方法】 从选题、参考文献等方面,总结我国期刊述评类综述的学术质量存在的诸多问题。【结果】 述评类综述对同行的科研工作具有很高的参考价值,也为读者提高写作水平提供借鉴。但是我国一些述评类综述的选题和内容质量参差不齐,例如选题陈旧,选题过大、内容空洞,选题与前人雷同等;在参考文献的筛查、组织管理和评论等方面,存在文献堆积,时效性和代表性差等问题。【结论】 人们已经迈入碎片化阅读的时代,综述的信息含量丰富、可读性强,作者和办刊者应当从选题和参考文献质量等方面综合评价述评类综述的学术质量。
[Purposes] Commentary reviews in scientific journals integrate research progress, the latest research results, potential problems, and development trend of domestic and overseas academic activities for one subject, thus commentary reviews have valuable bibliographic value and academic status. This paper emphasizes that authors and editors must improve the academic quality of commentary reviews. [Methods] In the aspects of topics and literatures, the academic quality problems of commentary reviews in Chinese journals were summarized. [Findings] The commentary reviews have high academic reference value and contribute to improving the readers' writing ability. But the topics and literatures are unsatisfactory. Some topics are obsolete and lack of novelty, some are vacuous, and some topics are similar to previous ones. In terms of classification, organization and comment of the literatures, a mass of literatures are accumulated and have no timeliness and representativeness. [Conclusions] The commentary reviews are more important because of their abundant information and readability. The authors and editors should ensure the quality of review articles, and put an emphasis on topics and literatures.