中国科技期刊研究 ›› 2016, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (10): 1085-1089. doi: 10.11946/cjstp.201604250350

• 评价与分析 • 上一篇    下一篇

期刊编辑参与科研活动现状调查及促进策略探讨

林加西   

  1. 广东医科大学学报编辑部,广东省湛江市霞山区文明东路2号 524023
  • 收稿日期:2016-04-25 修回日期:2016-09-18 出版日期:2016-10-15 发布日期:2016-10-15
  • 作者简介:林加西(ORCID:0000-0001-5496-9966),本科,编辑,E-mail: gdmcxuebao@163.com。

Survey and analysis on journal editors’participation in scientific research

LIN Jiaxi   

  1. Editorial Departmentof Journal of Guangdong Medical University,Wenm ingdong Road,Xiashan District,Zhanjiang 524023,China
  • Received:2016-04-25 Revised:2016-09-18 Online:2016-10-15 Published:2016-10-15

摘要:

【目的】了解我国期刊编辑的科研活动现状,探讨促进期刊编辑参与科研活动的策略。【方法】编制“期刊编辑参与科研活动现状调查”问卷,采取网络发放与现场调查的方式对我国期刊编辑展开调查。【结果】调查问卷的有效回收率为60.34%。结果显示:仅六成编辑组织或参与编辑学课题、非编辑学类课题,其中自然科学类期刊编辑参与率较高(P<0.01);期刊编辑参与科研活动的3大障碍为工作时间不允许、没有经费和非编辑类科研成果不认同;工作需要和政策导向是驱使编辑进行科研活动的主要因素;最有效的激励政策为职称评比需要。【结论】期刊编辑参与科研活动的现状不乐观。明确科研地位、强化科研意识、支持多向发展、打造优势平台、增设激励政策是促进期刊编辑参与科研活动的有效策略。

关键词: 期刊编辑, 科研活动, 调查, 促进策略

Abstract:

[Purposes] Given their involvement in scientific research,this paper manages to explore relative strategies in the promotion of scientific activities among the journal editors. [Methods] Taking the journal editors nationw ide as the subject,this paper has designed a survey with questionnaires on journal editors’involvement in scientific research.The survey was conducted through online and onsite. [Findings] 60.34% of questionnaires released were received as valid copies.Through the survey,it suggested that only about sixty percent of the subjects had organized or anticipated in editorial projects or non-editorial ones,among which journal editors of nature science owned higher percentage of participation (P<0.01).Working hour lim itation,lack of funds,and disapproval in non-editorial scientific findingswere taken as the threemajor obstacles the journal editorswere confronting in scientific research.Professional requirements and the policy guidance were the two key elementswhich promoted journal editors’scientific involvement.Promotion in position was considered as the most effective way to encourage editors to get involved in scientific research. [Conclusions] The survey revealed dissatisfaction in journal editors’involvement in scientific research.Base on this,this paper manages to explore effective ways to develop scientific research among journal editors,including defining the scientific status for editors,enhancing their scientific awareness,pursuing multi-development,creating a scientific atmosphere,building a superior scientific platform,and establishing effective strategies ofmotivation.

Key words: Journal editors, Scientific research, Investigation, Strategy promotion