中国科技期刊研究 ›› 2019, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (5): 531-536.doi: 10.11946/cjstp.201901080020

• 评价与分析 • 上一篇    下一篇

我国人文社会科学英文期刊评价的难点与对策

苏金燕   

  1. 中国社会科学评价研究院,北京市建国门内大街5号 100732
  • 收稿日期:2019-01-08 修回日期:2019-02-03 出版日期:2019-05-15 发布日期:2019-05-31
  • 作者简介:苏金燕(ORCID:0000-0003-0647-308X),博士,副研究员,研究室副主任,E-mail: sujy@cass.org.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家社会科学基金重大委托项目“社科研究领域哲学社会科学成果评价体系与奖励制度研究”(2016MZD003)

Implementation difficulties and solutions in the evaluation of China’s English journals of humanities and social sciences

SU Jinyan   

  1. Chinese Institute of Social Sciences Evaluation Studies, 5 Jianguomennei Dajie, Beijing 100732, China
  • Received:2019-01-08 Revised:2019-02-03 Online:2019-05-15 Published:2019-05-31

摘要:

【目的】 分析人文社会科学英文期刊评价指标的设计及存在的问题。【方法】 在了解我国英文期刊发展现状的基础上,分析近期国家政策文件要求,设计人文社会科学英文期刊评价模型和评价指标体系。【结果】 在人文社会科学英文期刊评价模型的设计过程中,将评价指标划分为一票否决指标、计分指标、扣分指标和观察指标,并构建由吸引力、管理力、影响力3个一级指标构成的人文社会科学英文期刊评价指标体系。【结论】 规模性开展评价工作时首先要解决“家底”不清的问题,其次需进一步对“英文期刊”进行界定,最后还要解决定量评价数据及专家同行评议问题。

关键词: 人文社会科学, 期刊评价, 英文期刊, 评价模型, 评价指标

Abstract:

[Purposes] This paper aims to analyze the design of evaluation indicator for the English journals of humanities and social sciences and its problems. [Methods] Based on the analysis of policy documents, especially published in 2018, the process evaluation model and indicator system were established based on knowing the state of English journals published in China. [Finding] In the process of designing the evaluation model for English journals of humanities and social sciences, the evaluation indicators are divided into one-vote veto indicator, score indicator, point-deduction indicator, and observation indicator, and three first-class indicators of attraction power, management power, and impact power are constructed. [Conclusions] Three problems need to be solved in turns, which respectively are finding humanities and social sciences English academic journals, defining the concept of English journal, and quantitatively evaluating the data and the expert peer review.

Key words: Humanities and social sciences, Journal evaluation, English journal, Evaluation model, Evaluation indicator