中国科技期刊研究 ›› 2019, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (5): 559-564.doi: 10.11946/cjstp.201812171100

• 评价与分析 • 上一篇    

科研人员视角的学术期刊影响力因素分析及其对期刊发展的启示

王志娟1),法志强2)   

  1. 1) 南方医科大学珠江医院《中华神经医学杂志》编辑部,广东省广州市工业大道中253号 510282
    2) 南方医科大学珠江医院神经外科,广东省广州市工业大道中253号 510282
  • 收稿日期:2018-12-17 修回日期:2019-03-18 出版日期:2019-05-15 发布日期:2019-05-31
  • 作者简介:王志娟(ORCID:0000-0002-3456-0589),硕士,副编审,E-mail: snow_migrant@163.com|法志强,博士,副主任医师
  • 基金资助:
    广东省科技计划项目(2017A030303020);省级及以上基金论文比

Influence evaluation of academic journals based on the perspective of scientific researchers and corresponding development suggestions

WANG Zhijuan1),FA Zhiqiang2)   

  1. 1) Editorial Office of Chinese Journal of Neuromedicine, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, 253 Industrial Avenue, Guangzhou 510282, China
    2) Department of Neurosurgery, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, 253 Industrial Avenue, Guangzhou 510282, China
  • Received:2018-12-17 Revised:2019-03-18 Online:2019-05-15 Published:2019-05-31

摘要:

【目的】 探讨医学科研人员评价期刊影响力的要素及重要程度。【方法】 选取中华医学会信息管理平台中在《中华神经医学杂志》发表论文的作者及其同行(包括医学高校科研工作者、医院临床医生共226名),采用网络问卷(问卷星)的形式进行调查,调查内容包括调查对象的基本信息、对期刊评价的认知程度和途径、对26个期刊影响力评价指标(18个客观指标、8个主观指标)重要性的评分。【结果】 医药学科专家认可度是所有指标中重要性评分最高的指标;主观指标中重要性从高到低依次为学术影响力、出版行业影响力,社会影响力;客观指标中影响因子是重要性评分最高的指标,重要性从高到低依次为被引、被收录、被下载、稿源特征和时效性指标。省级及以上基金论文比是稿源特征指标中重要性评分最高的指标。【结论】 期刊发展应以定量数据为依据,以学术质量为根本。只有提高期刊的曝光率和正面宣传频率,出版重大课题研究成果专题,更好地满足科研人员的信息需求,才能使科技期刊成为科研人员最关注的学术交流平台。

关键词: 科研人员, 期刊评价, 期刊影响力, 学科专家认可度, 影响因子

Abstract:

[Purposes] This paper aims to explore the factors with which medical researchers evaluate the influence of journals and their importance degree. [Methods] We selected authors of Chinese Journal of Neuromedicine from the information management platform of Chinese Medical Association and their colleagues (including a total of 226 scientific researchers in medical universities and doctors in hospitals), and performed an investigation using the online questionnaire (Questionnaire Star), which included the basic information of the respondents, the degree and way of cognition about journal evaluation, and the importance scores of the 26 evaluation indexes (18 objective indexes and 8 subjective indexes) of journal influence. [Finding] Expert's recognition is the most important index among all the indicators. The academic influence is the most important index among the subjective indexes, followed by the influence in publishing industry, and social influence. Impact factor is the most important index among the objective indicators. The order of importance is indicator of citation, being included by database, being downloaded, manuscript feature, and timeliness. The paper ratio with provincial-level and the above fund is the most important index among the indicators of manuscript feature. [Conclusions] The development of medical journals should be based on quantitative data, focus on academic quality, improve exposure and positive propagation, and publish the major project results to meet the information needs of researchers. Then journals will become the academic platform most concerned by researchers.

Key words: Scientific researcher, Journal evaluation, Journal influence, Expert's recognition, Impact factor