中国科技期刊研究 ›› 2019, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (1): 83-87.doi: 10.11946/cjstp.201805210450

• 评价与分析 • 上一篇    下一篇

我国SSCI收录期刊影响因子相关自被引率的国际对比研究

方红玲1,2   

  1. (1) 新乡医学院期刊社《眼科新进展》编辑部,河南省新乡市红旗区金穗大道601号 453003
    (2) 新乡医学院河南省科技期刊研究中心,河南省新乡市红旗区金穗大道601号 453003
  • 收稿日期:2018-05-21 修回日期:2018-09-19 出版日期:2019-01-15 发布日期:2019-01-15
  • 作者简介:方红玲(ORCID:0000-0001-7199-3650),硕士,副编审,编辑部主任,E-mail: fhl@xxmu.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    河南省教育厅人文社会科学研究项目(2018-ZZJH-418);新乡医学院人文社会科学研究基地培育基金

Comparison between self-cited rate in correlation with impact factor of SSCI journals from China and other countries

FANG Hongling1,2   

  1. (1) Editorial Office of Recent Advances in Ophthalmology, Periodicals Publishing House of Xinxiang Medical University, 601 Jinsui Road, Hongqi District, Xinxiang 453003, China
    (2) Henan Research Center for Science Journals, Xinxiang Medical University, 601 Jinsui Road, Hongqi District, Xinxiang 453003, China
  • Received:2018-05-21 Revised:2018-09-19 Online:2019-01-15 Published:2019-01-15

摘要:

【目的】 分析我国SSCI收录期刊影响因子相关自被引率(Self-Cited Rate in Correlation with Impact Factor,SCR-IF)的状况,为我国SSCI收录期刊今后发展提供参考。【方法】 以我国和G7国家(美国、英国、德国、法国、意大利、加拿大、日本)以及新兴国家代表(韩国、印度、俄罗斯)的SSCI收录期刊为研究对象,分别计算样本期刊的自被引率(Self-Cited Rate,SCR),同时计算SCR-IF、非影响因子相关自被引率(Self-Cited Rate Non-Correlation with Impact Factor,SCR-NIF),以及二者比值(K),对11个国家SSCI收录期刊的SCR-IF、SCR-NIF、SCR、K进行比较分析。【结果】 11个国家SSCI收录期刊的SCR-IF均值均大于SCR-NIF均值和SCR均值,K的均值范围为1.3583.040;我国SSCI收录期刊SCR-IF和SCR-NIF均低于法国、韩国、俄罗斯,SCR-IF还低于德国,SCR-NIF还低于意大利、印度,高于其他国家。我国SSCI收录期刊中,SCR-IF为0的期刊占比为9.09%,只高于美国、英国和俄罗斯,低于其他国家;我国SSCI收录期刊中,K>1.0且SCR-NIF>0.2的期刊占比为9.09%。【结论】 我国SSCI收录期刊的SCR不高,但是SCR-IF高于SCR,可能与我国被SSCI收录期刊数量较少有关。

关键词: SSCI收录期刊, 自被引率, 影响因子, 期刊评价

Abstract:

[Purposes] This paper aims to analyze the status quo of self-cited rate in correlation with impact factor (SCR-IF) of Chinese journals indexed in SSCI database, and further interpret the role of self-citation in the impact factors to provide references for scientific journals and master journals development directions. [Methods] The SSCI journals from China, the G7 countries (USA, UK, Germany, France, Italy, Canada, and Japan), and emerging countries (South Korea, India, and Russia) were taken as the research objects. All self-cited rates (SCR) of the above journals were calculated, and the SCR-IF, the self-cited rate non-correlation with impact factor (SCR-NIF), and the ratio (K) among them were calculated at the same time. This study took a comparative analysis on the SCR-IF, SCR-NIF, SCR, and K for these countries. [Findings] The mean SCR-IF in 11 countries is all higher than the mean SCR-NIF and the mean SCR, and the mean K ranges from 1.358 to 3.040. SCR-IF and SCR-NIF in China are lower than those of France, South Korea, and Russia. Furthermore, the SCR-IF is lower than those of Germany, and SCR-NIF is lower than those of Italy and India, but higher than those of other countries. In China, the proportion of SSCI journals with SCR-IF as 0 is 9.09%, only higher than those of USA, UK, and Russia, but lower than those of other countries. In China, the proportion of SSCI journals with K>1.0 and SCR-NIF >0.2 is 9.09%. [Conclusions] SCR of SSCI journals in China is not relatively high, but SCR-IF is relatively higher than SCR. It may attributed to the fact that there are few journals indexed by SSCI.

Key words: SSCI journal, Self-cited rate, Impact factor, Journal evaluation