中国科技期刊研究 ›› 2018, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (7): 739-744.doi: 10.11946/cjstp.201803200248

• 能力建设 • 上一篇    下一篇

高校医学学报重点号组稿模式的建立与思考——以《山东大学学报(医学版)》为例

顾黎,陈斌,周英智   

  1. 山东大学科技期刊社, 山东省济南市经十路17923号 250061
  • 收稿日期:2018-03-20 修回日期:2018-05-09 出版日期:2018-07-15 发布日期:2018-07-15
  • 作者简介:顾 黎(ORCID:0000-0001-9466-7663),博士,副编审,E-mail:yehe.gl@sdu.edu.cn|陈 斌,编审,社长;周英智,编审,副社长。

Comprehensive thinking on establishment of working mode for organizing key issues in the medical journals of universities:Taking the Journal of Shandong University (Health Sciences) as an example

GU Li,CHEN Bin,ZHOU Yingzhi   

  1. Scientific Journal Press, Shandong University, 17923 Jingshi Road, Jinan 250061, China
  • Received:2018-03-20 Revised:2018-05-09 Online:2018-07-15 Published:2018-07-15

摘要:

【目的】 总结笔者所在期刊组织专题/专刊(以下简称“重点号”)的工作模式,为高校医学学报实现规模化组稿提供参考。【方法】 比较《山东大学学报(医学版)》2016—2017年刊发的7个重点号中的约稿及同卷期自由来稿的下载频次和被引频次,分析重点号的刊出效果。回顾重点号的组织过程,总结组稿模式,归纳要点,反思不足。【结果】 重点号约稿的篇均下载频次和被引频次分别是同卷期自由来稿的2.74倍和6.00倍,基本实现预期的约稿效果。《山东大学学报(医学版)》通过两年多的实践,建立了适合自身发展的重点号组稿模式,主编和编委的办刊热情得到了有效激发,组稿达到较大规模,办刊进入良性循环。【结论】 建立的重点号组稿模式可以明显提升期刊的学术影响力,具有较强的可操作性和可复制性;高校医学学报可以通过主动建立适合自身发展的组稿模式,突破办刊困境。

关键词: 高校学报, 医学, 专题, 专刊, 重点号, 组稿, 工作模式

Abstract:

[Purposes] We summarize the working mode for organizing special topics and special issues (collectively called "key issues") in the Journal of Shandong University (Health Sciences), in order to provide references for medical journals of universities to solicit contribution on relatively large-scale. [Methods] A comparison was conducted on the download and citation frequencies between the soliciting and free contributions from 7 key issues, which were published in the Journal of Shandong University (Health Sciences) from 2016 to 2017. The publication effect of the key issues was analyzed. After the whole process of organizing key issues was reviewed, the working mode and key points for soliciting contributions were refined. A profound thinking on the deficiencies of the mode was also made. [Findings] The download and citation frequencies of the soliciting contributions are 2.74 times and 6.00 times higher than those of the free contributions in the same issue. By more than 2 years' practice, we set up a working mode for soliciting contributions on a larger scale, by which the enthusiasm of editorial board members is effectively inspired, and thus the development of the journal entered into a virtuous cycle. [Conclusions] The academic influence of the journal is improved by the published key issues, and the established contribution-soliciting mode is maneuverable and replicable. It is feasible for the medical journals of universities to set up an individualized working mode on soliciting contributions, by which the dilemma of running a journal can be broken.

Key words: Journal of university, Medical science, Special topic, Special issue, Key issue, Contribution solicitation, Working mode