中国科技期刊研究 ›› 2015, Vol. 26 ›› Issue (4): 351-354.doi: 10.11946/cjstp.201412311258

• 质量建设 • 上一篇    下一篇

英文科技期刊遴选审稿专家的途径与原则——以《中国化学快报》为例

王俊丽,郭焕芳,郑爱莲   

  1. 中国医学科学院药物研究所期刊联合编辑部,北京市西城区南纬路甲2号 100050
  • 收稿日期:2014-12-31 修回日期:2015-03-17 出版日期:2015-04-15 发布日期:2015-04-15
  • 作者简介:王俊丽(ORCID:0000-0001-6281-6353),编辑,硕士研究生,E-mail: cclfy@imm.ac.cn

The approaches and principles of choosing reviewers for English scientific journals

WANG Junli,GUO Huanfang,ZHENG Ailian   

  1. The United Editorial Office of Institute of Materia Medica,Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences,2 Nanwei Road,Beijing 100050,China
  • Received:2014-12-31 Revised:2015-03-17 Online:2015-04-15 Published:2015-04-15

摘要: 目的为其他英文科技期刊编辑选择合适、准确的审稿专家提供参考借鉴。 方法 以《中国化学快报》为例,介绍英文科技期刊编辑快速选择合适、准确的“小同行”评审专家的途径和原则。结果 通过选取编委/青年编委、利用已有的审稿专家库、利用网络数据库、作者推荐、其他专家推荐或者学者自荐等途径,英文科技期刊编辑可以为稿件选到合适的专家审稿。结论 建立并及时维护审稿专家库,全面掌握审稿专家信息,可以提高审稿效率和期刊质量。

关键词: 英文科技期刊, 审稿专家, 遴选途径与原则, 专家库管理与维护

Abstract:

[Purpose] This article is aimed to provide a reference for editors in English scientific journals on how to choose appropriate and accurate peer-reviewers.[Methodology] Taking Chinese Chemical Letters as an example,we summarized the approaches and principles of choosing reviewers rapidly and accurately.[Findings] From the(Youth) Editorial Boards,previously established reviewers'database,candidates recommended by authors,database online,recommendations by other reviewers or themselves,editors of English scientific journals can choose appropriate peer-reviewers formanuscripts.[Conclusions] Review ing efficiency and journals'quality can be improved through establishment and timely maintenance of the reviewers'database.

Key words: English scientific journals, Peer-reviewers, Approaches and principles, Management and maintenance of the reviewers'database