中国科技期刊研究 ›› 2020, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (1): 63-70. doi: 10.11946/cjstp.201907020477

• 数字出版 • 上一篇    下一篇

我国科研人员和期刊编辑对学术期刊开放科学数据的认知调查分析

胡正君1),曾文1)(),刘素琴2),侯一宁3),张慧3),刘颖1)   

  1. 1) 中国科学院生态环境研究中心《环境化学》编辑部,北京市海淀区双清路18号 100085
    2) 中国科学院生态环境研究中心Journal of Environmental Sciences编辑部,北京市海淀区双清路18号 100085
    3) 中国科学院生态环境研究中心《生态毒理学报》编辑部,北京市海淀区双清路18号 100085
  • 收稿日期:2019-07-02 修回日期:2019-11-22 出版日期:2020-01-15 发布日期:2020-01-15
  • 通讯作者: 曾文 E-mail:zengwen@rcees.ac.cn
  • 作者简介:胡正君(ORCID:0000-0001-8125-7075),博士,编辑,E-mail:zjhu@rcees.ac.cn|刘素琴,硕士,编辑|侯一宁,博士,编辑部主任|张 慧,博士,编辑|刘 颖,硕士,编辑。
  • 基金资助:
    中国科学院自然科学期刊编辑研究会2018年研究课题(YJH-2018015)

Investigation and analysis of cognition of journal editors and scientific researchers on journal open scientific data in China

HU Zhengjun1),ZENG Wen1)(),LIU Suqin2),HOU Yining3),ZHANG Hui3),LIU Ying1)   

  1. 1) Editorial Office of Environmental Chemistry, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 18 Shuangqing Road, Haidian District, Beijing 100085, China
    2) Editorial Office of Journal of Environmental Sciences, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 18 Shuangqing Road, Haidian District, Beijing 100085, China
    3) Editorial Office of Asian Journal of Ecotoxicology, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 18 Shuangqing Road, Haidian District, Beijing 100085, China
  • Received:2019-07-02 Revised:2019-11-22 Online:2020-01-15 Published:2020-01-15
  • Contact: ZENG Wen E-mail:zengwen@rcees.ac.cn

摘要:

【目的】 从各个角度呈现我国科研人员和期刊编辑关于期刊开放科学数据的认知现状,为期刊科学数据开放政策的制订提供数据支持。【方法】 基于文献调研和现场调研确定调查内容,利用问卷星平台对我国期刊编辑和自然科学与工程技术领域的科研人员关于学术期刊开放科学数据的发展前景、担忧的问题,以及所需保障等问题进行调查,共获得950份自然科学与工程技术领域科研人员有效问卷和205份期刊编辑有效问卷。【结果】 我国科研人员在向国内外期刊投稿时遇到期刊要求提供原始数据的情况并不是非常普遍,很多期刊编辑对于期刊开放科学数据并不是非常了解;期刊编辑和科研人员基本都认为期刊开放科学数据有利于科研发展,双方均认为中文期刊开放科学数据是必然之势,但是需要一定的保障措施;国家的鼓励性措施、强制性措施均是促使期刊实施开放科学数据政策的可行方式。【结论】 科技期刊需加强开放科学数据的宣传,加深期刊编辑和科研人员对开放科学数据的认识;加强对原始数据的重视,提升期刊编辑对于文章原始数据的理解,并有意识地加强与作者关于原始数据的沟通,为原始数据全面开放提供参考。

关键词: 开放科学数据, 认知, 期刊编辑, 科研人员

Abstract:

[Purposes] The study aims to accurately know about the attitudes and cognition of journal editors and scientific researchers on journal open scientific data, and provide data support for the formulation of related policies on journal scientific data openness. [Methods] Based on literature research and face to face consultation, the contents of the survey were determined. And the questions, such as what the future prospect of journal open scientific data was, what they worried about, and what was necessary during the journal open scientific data process, were investigated via the platform of Wenjuanxing for editors and researchers. A total of 950 researchers and 205 editors answered the questions. [Findings] Many researchers have not been required to deliver the original data when submitting papers, and many editors did not understand the real meaning of journal open scientific data in China. Both editors and researchers believe that journal open scientific data is beneficial for the science research, and will be the development direction of scientific journals, however, some efforts should be made. Incentive and mandatory measures could be used to promote the journal open scientific data. [Conclusions] Scientific journals should strengthen the publicity of open scientific data, deepen the understanding of journal editors and scientific researchers on open scientific data. It is suggested that original data should be paid more attention to, and editors should discuss frequently with authors about data, for the preparation for the future journal open scientific data.

Key words: Open scientific data, Cognition, Journal editor, Scientific researcher