Abstract:

[Purposes] Based on the “multi-journal submission” of Cell Press and other “opening up multiple submission” models, this paper proposes an “opening up multiple submission” model for preprint platforms, providing a path reference for promoting the high-quality development of preprint platforms in China and maintaining a good academic ecosystem. [Methods] By using literature review, comparative analysis and case analysis methods, this paper sorts out the connotation, process and optimization path of the “opening up multiple submission” model of preprint platforms. [Findings] From the current practice, preprints can be centrally processed through a unified platform, with pre-review and recommendation by subject editors, and “community review” during open peer review, ultimately attracting journal acceptance, which has already shown the characteristics of the “opening up multiple submission” model. [Conclusions] Preprint platforms should further strengthen their attributes as submission platforms, form subject editor teams, set up peer review systems, and closely connect with academic journals to better achieve “opening up multiple submission”, play the role of a bridge and link between authors, readers and journals, and ultimately promote the high-quality development of Chinese academic communication system.

Key words: Preprint platform, Academic journals, Multiple submission, Multi-journal submission, Academic publishing

摘要：

【目的】借鉴细胞出版社(Cell Press)“多期刊投稿”等“开放一稿多投”模式,提出预印本平台“开放一稿多投”模式,为推动我国预印本平台高质量发展、维护良好的学术生态提供路径参考。【方法】 运用文献调研、对比分析和案例分析法,梳理预印本平台“开放一稿多投”模式的内涵、流程与优化路径。【结果】从现有实践来看,预印本能够通过统一平台实现稿件集中处理,由学科编辑进行预审、推荐,并在开放评议时进行“集体审稿”,最终吸引期刊采稿,已呈现出“开放一稿多投”模式的特征。【结论】预印本平台应进一步强化投稿平台属性、组建学科编辑团队、设置同行评议系统、密切与学术期刊的联系,更好地实现“开放一稿多投”,发挥连接作者、读者、期刊的桥梁和纽带作用,最终促进中国学术交流体系的高质量发展。

关键词: 预印本平台, 学术期刊, 一稿多投, 多期刊投稿, 学术出版