Abstract:

［Purposes］ This study introduces the commons theory into the field of scientific publishing, exploring its potential value in promoting the open sharing of scientific resources and optimizing the scientific publishing process. It aims to provide theoretical support and practical reference for constructing a high-level scientific journal system. ［Methods］ We proposed a framework of scientific commons by integrating decentralization, smart contracts, incentive mechanisms, and other technologies. We established a scientific publishing mechanism governed by authors, reviewers, academic editors, and arbitration committees. ［Findings］ The scientific commons mainly consist of a submission mechanism to complement preprints and scientific journals, a review mechanism to promote diversity among reviewers, and a post-review mechanism to ensure journal quality. The model subverts the traditional scientific publishing paradigm, shifting power from publishers to scientists, facilitating genuine sharing of scientific resources, and reducing the influence of non-scientific factors in the review process. ［Conclusions］ This innovative publishing model provides a reference for the sustainable development of the scientific publishing field, promoting its evolution towards a more open, fair, free, and democratic system.

Key words: Scientific commons, Academic publishing, Decentralization, Open access, Preprint

摘要：

【目的】将公地理论引入科学出版领域，探讨其在促进科学资源开放共享、优化科学出版流程方面的潜在价值，为构建高水平科技期刊体系提供理论支撑与实践参考。【方法】融合去中心化、智能合约、激励机制等技术提出科学公地的系统框架，建立由作者、审稿人、学术编辑以及仲裁委员会等多元角色共治的科学出版机制。【结果】科学公地主要包含协同预印本与期刊的投稿机制、促进主体多元化的评审机制以及把控期刊质量的后评审机制，可改变传统的科学出版模式，将权力由出版商转移到科学家手中，实现科学资源真正的共享，并减少评审过程中非科学因素的干扰。【结论】这一创新性的出版模式为科学出版领域的可持续发展提供参考，推动其向更为开放、公平、自由和民主的科学出版体系迈进。

关键词: 科学公地, 学术出版, 去中心化, 开放获取, 预印本