Abstract:

[Purposes] In line with the goal of modernizing national governance, this study proposes an approach for evaluating and developing think tank journals.[Methods] We examined three policy documents issued at critical points in think tank development and journal growth, identifying shared focus areas. Through literature analysis, key perspectives on think tank journal research were identified to establish primary evaluation dimensions or first-level indicators. Secondary and tertiary indicators were subsequently developed to align with the practical demands of national governance.[Findings] The evaluation framework comprises four primary indicators including decision-making influence, academic influence, social influence, and international influence. It further includes 13 secondary indicators, such as the foresight index, policy advisory index, and decision-making index, supported by 40 tertiary indicators.[Conclusions] Using this indicator framework as a foundation, and to support national governance, think tank journals can enhance policy supply-demand alignment to engage in the policy processes, elevate the quality of manuscripts, build journal clusters, and foster a unique discourse system for think tank publications.

Key words: National governance, Think tank journal, Decision-making, Scholarship, Society, International stage

摘要：

【目的】 国家治理现代化目标导向下,为智库期刊评价及建设提供思路。【方法】 选取在智库建设及期刊发展关键节点颁布的3份政策文件,比对提取共同关注内容;利用文献研究法提取现有智库期刊研究立足点,基于二者交集形成智库期刊评价维度即一级指标;在一级指标基础上结合服务国家治理现实需求建构二级指标、三级指标。【结果】 指标体系由决策影响力、学术影响力、社会影响力和国际影响力等4个一级指标和前瞻指数、资政指数、决策指数等13个二级指标及其对应的40个三级指标构成。【结论】 以指标体系为建设依据,以服务国家治理为目标,智库期刊可以加强政策供需对接参与政策过程、完成稿源水准升级、布局期刊集群建设、培育智库期刊话语体系为发力点,推进建设。

关键词: 国家治理, 智库期刊, 决策, 学术, 社会, 国际