[1] |
刘桂锋, 钱锦琳, 田丽丽. 开放科学: 概念辨析、体系解析与理念探析[J]. 图书馆论坛, 2018, 38(11):1-9.
|
[2] |
FOSTER. Resources:Help us promote open science and contribute training content [EB/OL]. [2023-02-14]. https://www.fosteropenscience.eu/resources.
URL
|
[3] |
Wolfram D, Peiling Ph D, Hembree A, et al. Open peer review:Promoting transparency in open science[J]. Scientometrics, 2020, 125(2):1033-1051.
doi: 10.1007/s11192-020-03488-4
|
[4] |
Armstrong J S. Barriers to scientific contributions:The author's formula[J]. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1982, 5(2):197-199.
doi: 10.1017/S0140525X00011201
URL
|
[5] |
Shotton D. The five stars of online journal articles:A framework for article evaluation[J]. D-Lib Magazine, 2012, 18(1/2):1015.
|
[6] |
孟美任, 张晓林. 中国科技期刊引入开放同行评议机制的思考与建议[J]. 中国科技期刊研究, 2019, 30(2):149-155.
doi: 10.11946/cjstp.201811120995
|
[7] |
McCormack N. Peer review and legal publishing:What law librarians need to know about open,single-blind,and double-blind reviewing[J]. Law Library Journal, 2009, 101(1):59-70.
|
[8] |
Walker R, da Silva P R. Emerging trends in peer review:A survey[J]. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 2015, 9:169.
|
[9] |
Harnad S. Creative disagreement[J]. The Sciences, 1979, 19(7):18-20.
|
[10] |
Janeway C A J. JMCI:The last issue[J]. Journal of Molecular and Cellular Immunology, 1990, 4(6):293.
|
[11] |
Sumner T, Shum S B. Open peer review & argumentation:Loosening the paper chains on journals[EB/OL]. [2023-02-05]. http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/5/jime/.
URL
|
[12] |
The BMJ. History of the BMJ[EB/OL]. [2023-02-05]. https://www.bmj.com/about-bmj/history-of-the-bmj.
URL
|
[13] |
Burley R, Moylan E. What might peer review look like in 2030?[R]. New York: BioMed Central and Digital Science, 2017.
|
[14] |
Pöschl U. Interactive journal concept for improved scientific publishing and quality assurance[J]. Learned Publishing, 2004, 17(2):105-113.
doi: 10.1087/leap.2004.17.issue-2
URL
|
[15] |
Ford E. Open peer review at four STEM journals:An observational overview[J]. F1000Research, 2015, 4:6.
doi: 10.12688/f1000research
URL
|
[16] |
Nature. Nature open peer-review trial:Conclusions[EB/OL]. (2006-12-21)[2023-02-14]. http://blogs.nature.com/nascent/2006/12/nature_open_peerreview_trial_c.html.
URL
|
[17] |
Frontiers. Collaborative peer review[EB/OL]. [2023-02-14]. https://www.frontiersin.org/about/review-system.
URL
|
[18] |
Janowicz K, Hitzler P. Open and transparent:The review process of the Semantic Web journal[J]. Learned Publishing, 2012, 25(1):48-55.
doi: 10.1087/leap.2012.25.issue-1
URL
|
[19] |
Giordan M, Csikasz-Nagy A, Collings A M, et al. The effects of an editor serving as one of the reviewers during the peer-review process[J]. F1000Research, 2016, 5:683.
pmid: 27508056
|
[20] |
F1000 blog network. F1000 Research Ltd wins European Commission contract to set up an open access publishing platform[EB/OL]. (2020-03-25)[2023-02-14]. https://f1000research.com/newsroom.
URL
|
[21] |
Groves T, Loder E. Prepublication histories and open peer review at The BMJ[J]. British Medical Journal, 2014, 349:g5394.
doi: 10.1136/bmj.g5394
URL
|
[22] |
《心理学报》稿件评审意见公开[EB/OL]. (2014-03-11)[2023-02-14]. https://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlxb/CN/news/news20.shtml.
URL
|
[23] |
Transparent peer review at Nature Communications[J]. Nature Communications, 2015, 6:10277.
doi: 10.1038/ncomms10277
|
[24] |
MDPI. The MDPI editorial process[EB/OL]. [2023-02-14]. https://www.mdpi.com/editorial_process.
URL
|
[25] |
姚占雷, 李美玉, 许鑫. 开放同行评议发展现状与问题辨析[J]. 编辑学报, 2022, 34(2):142-148.
|
[26] |
Eisen M B, Akhmanova A, Behrens T E, et al. Peer review without gatekeeping[J]. eLife, 2022, 11:83889.
|
[27] |
百度百科. 欧洲地球科学联盟[EB/OL]. [2023-02-14]. https://baike.baidu.com/item/%E6%AC%A7%E6%B4%B2%E5%9C%B0%E7%90%83%E7%A7%91%E5%AD%A6%E8%81%94%E7%9B%9F/59140391?fr=aladdin.
URL
|
[28] |
王丽丽, 高霏. 一种新的审稿方式[J]. 编辑学报, 2017, 29(2):145-148.
|
[29] |
包雅琳, 钱寿初. 网上公开审稿:审稿机制的改革[J]. 中国科技期刊研究, 2001, 12(1):44-46.
|
[30] |
冯广清. 科技期刊同行评议审稿方式调查与评析[J]. 学会, 2016(12):55-60.
|
[31] |
Morrison J. The case for open peer review[J]. Medical Education, 2006, 40(9):830-831.
pmid: 16925631
|
[32] |
杜杏叶, 李贺, 王玲, 等. 中国学者对学术论文公开同行评议的接受度研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2018, 62(2):73-81.
doi: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2018.02.011
|
[33] |
刘春丽, 何钦成. 开放同行评审的产生、发展、成效与可行性[J]. 中国科技期刊研究, 2013, 24(1):40-44.
|
[34] |
van Gestel R. Ranking,peer review,bibliometrics and alternative ways to improve the quality of doctrinal legal scholarship[M]//van Gestel R,Micklitz H W,Rubin E L,et al. Rethinking legal scholarship. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press, 2017:351-398.
|
[35] |
冯广清. 医学期刊的公开审稿制度[J]. 中华医学图书情报杂志, 2012, 21(4):79-81.
|
[36] |
宫福满. 科技期刊论文审稿人署名弊大于利[J]. 编辑学报, 2007, 19(1):80.
|
[37] |
汪谋岳, 王娟. 审稿人对公开审稿人身份的态度调查分析[J]. 中国科技期刊研究, 2002, 13(6):516-517.
|