【目的】 根据待审稿件的学科方向与内容,为其选择匹配度较高的审稿专家。【方法】 从文献数据库中选择与待审稿件学科方向相同的文献,优选其中合适的作者作为审稿专家,并依次通过采编系统的审稿专家库、国家和国家各部委基金项目数据库、专家所在单位官方网站验证审稿专家的各项信息。【结果】 选择与待审稿件学科方向相同的文献作者作为审稿专家,审稿结果更为科学合理,审稿效率得到很大提高。【结论】 选择审稿专家不能仅仅依据其一级学科方向从审稿专家库中简单选择,还需要从文献数据库、基金项目数据库和专家所在单位官方网站三个维度验证专家所在研究方向与待审稿件学科方向的匹配度,满足条件才能作为审稿专家。
[Purposes] According to the subject direction and content of the manuscript, the peer reviewers with high matching degree for the manuscript are selected. [Methods] The literature that highly matches the subject direction of the audited manuscript was selected from the bibliographic database, the appropriate authors were taken as the reviewers, and the information of reviewer was successively verified through the reviewer database of editing system, the fund project database of nation or national ministries and commissions, and the official website of authors' affiliations. [Findings] It is proved that the result of the review is more scientific and reasonable, and the efficiency of the review is greatly improved by selecting the author who closely matches the subject direction of the audited manuscript as the expert of the review. [Conclusions] We not only simply select the expert from the expert database based on the first-level discipline direction, but also verify the matching degree of the expert research direction and the manuscript discipline direction from three dimensions which are bibliographic database, fund project database, and official website of affiliations. And then the expert who meets the conditions can be selected.