摘要：

【目的】分析“双一流”建设高校期刊发展现状,识别高校期刊在“双一流”建设中扮演的角色及存在的问题,并针对性提出优化策略,促进高校期刊有效赋能“双一流”建设。【方法】以147所第二轮“双一流”建设高校主办期刊为研究对象,整合期刊官网详细数据和中国知网期刊基本指标,结合一流学科名单,从期刊数量特征、影响力、办刊模式、学科协同性等维度深度剖析高校期刊发展现状。【结果】“双一流”建设高校期刊具备良好的数量基础但质量差异显著,办刊模式呈集群化发展新趋势但仍面临诸多障碍,期刊与一流学科的协同性整体不高。【结论】“双一流”建设高校期刊应聚焦优势学科打造特色化内容矩阵,倡导集群化办刊和专家办刊,建立“期刊—学科”价值协同机制,实现期刊发展与学科建设的双向赋能。

关键词: “双一流”建设, 高校期刊, 集群化办刊, 卓越期刊

Abstract:

[Purposes] This paper aims to analyze the current development status of journals from “Double First-Class” universities, identify the roles they play and the problems they face in the “Double First-Class” construction, and propose targeted optimization strategies to effectively empower the “Double First-Class” construction through university journals. [Methods] Taking 147 journals hosted by the second-round “Double First-Class” universities as the research object, this study integrates detailed data from the journal's official websites and basic indicators from CNKI, and combines the list of first-class disciplines to deeply analyze the current development status of university journals from the dimensions of quantity characteristics, influence, publishing models, and disciplinary synergy. [Findings] Journals from “Double First-Class” universities have a good quantitative foundation but significant quality differences. Their publishing models are showing a new trend of cluster development but still face many obstacles. The overall synergy between journals and first-class disciplines is not high. [Conclusions] Journals from “Double First-Class” universities should focus on their advantageous disciplines to create a characteristic content matrix, advocate for cluster-based journal management and expert-led editorial practices, and establish a “journal-discipline” value synergy mechanism to achieve mutual empowerment between journal development and discipline construction.

Key words: “Double First-Class” construction, University journals, Cluster publishing, Outstanding journals