中国科技期刊研究 ›› 2025, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (12): 1658-1662. doi: 10.11946/cjstp.202510301321

• • 上一篇    下一篇

我国科技期刊智库能力建设的若干思考

何书金()(), 盛文萍   

  1. 中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所《地理学报》编辑部,北京市朝阳区大屯路甲11号 100101
  • 收稿日期:2025-10-30 修回日期:2025-12-23 出版日期:2025-12-25 发布日期:2026-01-27
  • 作者简介:

    何书金(ORCID:0000-0001-9398-3269),研究员,编辑部主任,E-mail:

    何书金《地理学报》专职副主编、《地理学报》(中、英版)编辑部主任。中国地理学会副秘书长兼编辑出版工作委员会主任,曾获 “第五届中国出版政府奖优秀出版人物”“中国科技期刊卓越行动计划优秀编辑和优秀百人-期刊管理人” “中国科学技术期刊编辑学会银牛奖”等奖项

    盛文萍,博士,副编审。

    盛文萍 《地理学报》编辑,博士,副编审,中国科学院“科技期刊审读工作”审读专家,主要从事资源生态领域研究工作,主持国家自然科学基金 2 项,发表论文 30 余篇,参编著作 2 部。曾获中国科学院自然科学期刊编辑研究会研究课题三等奖。

    作者贡献声明: 何书金:提出研究思路; 盛文萍:论文写作及修改。

Reflections and recommendations on the building of think⁃tank capacity of China’s scientific journals

HE Shujin()(), SHENG Wenping   

  1. A Datun Road,Chaoyang District,Beijing 100101,China
  • Received:2025-10-30 Revised:2025-12-23 Online:2025-12-25 Published:2026-01-27

摘要:

目的 探讨我国科技期刊智库功能,展望科技期刊智库能力建设的发展方向。 方法 系统梳理科技期刊作为智库资源在知识积淀、专家网络、学术引领、传播交流等方面的优势。 结果 目前我国科技期刊在智库能力发展建设中仍存在学术积累转化为决策支持的能力不足,智库产品的系统性产出、传达渠道不畅等挑战。我国科技期刊在主责主业基础上,基于引领、传播、支撑这几大职能,抱团取暖,共同推动科技期刊智库能力的整体跃升。 结论 科技期刊在完成日常主责主业工作的同时,要充分发挥学术引领、成果传播和数据构筑等智库功能,并通过集群化发展,实现智库功能的持续和稳定发挥。

关键词: 科技期刊, 智库, 知识服务, 能力建设, 期刊集群

Abstract:

Purposes This study aims to explore the think tank functions of China’s scientific journals, and prospects the development direction of think tank capacity building for them. Methods The advantages of scientific journals as think tank resources were reviewed, including academic accumulation, expert networks, academic leadership, and academic communication and exchange. Findings The current status and challenges in the development of think tank capabilities of Chinese scientific journals were analyzed, highlighting insufficient capacity to translate academic accumulation into decision-making support, limited practice in systematic think tank products, and inadequate communication channels. Based on their primary responsibilities and functions, such as leadership, dissemination, and support, scientific journals in China are collaborating to jointly promote the overall enhancement of their think tank capabilities. Conclusions Based on the daily primary responsibilities, their think tank functions of the scientific journals should be strengthen, such as academic leadership, dissemination of research outcomes, and data infrastructure development. Through cluster-based development, these think tank functions can be sustained and stably maintained.

Key words: Scientific journals, Think tank, Knowledge services, Capacity building, Journal clusters