中国科技期刊研究 ›› 2017, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (5): 402-406. doi: 10.11946/cjstp.201612191002

• 同行评议专题 • 上一篇    下一篇

我国学术期刊实现有效同行评议“四部曲”

彭芳,金建华,黄建荣   

  1. 浙江大学医学院附属第一医院期刊中心《中华临床感染病杂志》编辑部,浙江省杭州市庆春路79号 310003
  • 收稿日期:2016-12-19 修回日期:2017-04-01 出版日期:2017-05-15 发布日期:2017-05-15
  • 作者简介:彭芳(ORCID:0000-0002-9692-400X),硕士,责任编辑, E-mail: pengfang_007@163.com。|金建华,本科,期刊中心副主任。|黄建荣,本科,编辑部主任,教授。

Four steps to realize effective peer review of academics journals published in China

PENG Fang,JIN Jianhua,HUANG Jianrong   

  1. Editorial Department of Chinese Journal of Clinical Infectious Diseases, Academic Journal Publishing Center, the First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, 79 Qingchun Road, Hangzhou 310003, China
  • Received:2016-12-19 Revised:2017-04-01 Online:2017-05-15 Published:2017-05-15

摘要:

【目的】探讨我国学术期刊实现有效同行评议的策略。【方法】针对我国期刊同行评议的现状和存在的问题,参考国外期刊的先进经验和方法,从顶层设计出发,探讨我国学术期刊在改善同行评议制度中可采取的措施。【结果】提出加强政策的支持和鼓励,完善评审专家队伍,优化审稿方式和健全评价与反馈制度,提高学术出版质量的具体方法。【结论】上述四步措施有助于实现同行评议在学术监督与把关中的有效作用。

关键词: 学术期刊, 同行评议, 制度保障体系, 学术共同体, 评议模式

Abstract:

[Purposes] This paper aims to explore the strategies to achieve the effective peer review. [Methods] Based on advanced experience and measures taken by foreign journals, the problems existing in peer review of academics journals published in China were analyzed and improvement measures from the top level design were put forward. [Findings] Concrete measures include policy support and protection, comprehensive evaluation experts teams,optimized review patterns and sound evaluation and feedback systems. [Conclusions] Four kinds of measures mentioned above contribute to implementing the effective role of peer review in academic supervision and checks.

Key words: Academic journal, Peer review, Institution ensuring system, Academic community, Review model