摘要：

【目的】以医学研究论文为例，聚焦提升同行评议质量的几个问题进行综述。【方法】 采用小组讨论确定同行评议质量的基本论点，采用文献研究法，论述评析提升同行评议质量的相关问题。【结果】 明确同行评议的目的与意义；从应行性原则和禁行原则两方面归纳审稿人的行为规范；梳理同行评议报告的形式和内容。提出为提升同行评议的质量，科学编辑应精准化、全方位为一篇论文遴选审稿人，向审稿人明示审稿的任务要求，将论文的查新（旧）结果发送给审稿人以辅助审稿；期刊编辑部应制定录用标准和编辑政策。【结论】 科学编辑应主动作为：做好审稿人培训，激发审稿人的荣誉感，约束审稿人行为，执行推广规范、时宜、与国际接轨的同行评议制度；以审稿质量的提升控制期刊的学术质量。

Abstract:

[Purposes] ?This study focuses on several problems in improving the quality of peer review in medical research articles through a review. [Methods] We determined the basic arguments for the quality of peer review through group discussions. We employed the literature research method to discuss and analyze the issues related to improving the quality of peer review. [Findings] The purpose and significance of peer review are clarified. The behavior norms for reviewers are summarized from both the principles of what should be done and what should not be done. The form and content of the peer review report are sorted out. It is proposed that to improve the quality of peer review, scientific editors should select reviewers for a paper accurately and comprehensively, make the reviewers understand the task requirements clearly, and send the results of the paper's novelty search to the reviewers to assist in the review. Journal editorial departments should establish acceptance criteria and editorial policies. [Conclusions] Scientific editors should take initiative: conduct reviewer training well, positively guide the sense of honor of reviewers, restrain reviewer behavior, and implement and promote a standardized, timely, and internationally-aligned peer review system, thus controlling the academic quality of journals by improving the review quality.

中图分类号: 

• 同行评议

• 医学期刊

• 质量控制

• 多学科同行评议

• Peer review

• Medical journal

• Quality control

• Multidisciplinary peer review