中国科技期刊研究 ›› 2024, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (11): 1530-1540. doi: 10.11946/cjstp.202409060986

• 论坛 • 上一篇    下一篇

国际学术出版学(协)会的运行机制及其在新时期的智库角色探讨

仇华炳1,2)()(), 吕青3),*()(), 佘诗刚4)   

  1. 1)中国科学院武汉文献情报中心,湖北省武汉市武昌区小洪山西25号 430071
    2)科技大数据湖北省重点实验室,湖北省武汉市武昌区小洪山西25号 430071
    3)中国科学院文献情报中心《智库理论与实践》编辑部,北京市海淀区北四环西路33号 100190
    4)中国科学院武汉岩土力学研究所《岩石力学与岩土工程学报(英文)》编辑部,湖北省武汉市武昌区小洪山2号 430071
  • 收稿日期:2024-09-06 修回日期:2024-10-18 出版日期:2024-11-15 发布日期:2024-12-23
  • 通讯作者: 吕青
  • 作者简介:

    仇华炳(ORCID:0000-0002-4421-3900),硕士,馆员,E-mail:

    佘诗刚,研究员,执行主编。

    作者贡献声明: 仇华炳:设计研究框架,调研文献,撰写、修改论文; 吕 青:提出研究选题和研究思路,修改论文; 佘诗刚:组织课题讨论,协调课题研究与实施,提出修改意见,修改论文。
  • 基金资助:
    国家新闻出版署智慧出版与知识服务重点实验室2023年度开放课题“学术期刊新型出版智库规划设计与路线图研究”(ZHCB202322)

Exploring operational mechanisms of international scholarly publishing associations and their role as think tanks in a new era

QIU Huabing1,2)()(), LÜ Qing3),*()(), SHE Shigang4)   

  1. 1) National Science Library (Wuhan), Chinese Academy of Sciences, 25 West Xiaohongshan, Wuchang District, Wuhan 430071, China
    2) Hubei Key Laboratory of Big Data in Science and Technology, 25 West Xiaohongshan, Wuchang District, Wuhan 430071, China
    3) Editorial Office of Think Tank: Theory & Practice , National Science Library, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 33 Beisihuan Xilu, Haidian District, Beijing 100190, China
    4) Editorial Office of Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering , Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2 Xiaohongshan, Wuchang District, Wuhan 430071, China
  • Received:2024-09-06 Revised:2024-10-18 Online:2024-11-15 Published:2024-12-23
  • Contact: Lü Qing

摘要:

【目的】探讨在学术出版行业发生重要转型变革的新时期,国际学术出版学(协)会的运行机制、发展态势及其发挥智库作用的方式和实践案例。【方法】 通过文献调研与案例分析的方法,选取5家具有代表性的国际学术出版学(协)会进行深入调研,对包括组织结构、业务运作和人才建设等在内的运行机制进行深入分析,从开放获取、人工智能应用、出版伦理和出版规范4个代表性维度归纳总结其发挥智库作用的实践案例。【结果】 国际学术出版学(协)会引导学术出版行业积极应对全球信息技术变革,发挥政策研究、发布标准、提供解决方案和工作指南等出版行业智库的作用。【结论】 国际学术出版学(协)会的一些运行机制及其发挥智库作用的经验对我国学术出版学(协)会建设出版智库、促进我国学术期刊行业发展具有启示作用。

Abstract:

[Purposes] This study aims to systematically investigate the operational mechanisms, developmental trends, think tank roles, and practical examples of leading international scholarly publishing associations during a period of significant transformation in the scholarly publishing industry. [Methods] Through literature review and case analysis, we selected five representative international scholarly publishing associations for an in-depth study. Their operational mechanisms such as organizational structure, business practices, and talent development were analyzed, and practical examples of their think tank roles were examined across four key areas: open access, AI applications, publishing ethics, and standards. [Findings] International scholarly publishing associations are guiding the industry in proactively addressing global information technology changes, fulfilling their think tank roles by conducting policy research, issuing standards, and offering solutions and guidelines. [Conclusions] The operational mechanisms and think tank experiences of these associations offer valuable insights for building scholarly publishing think tanks and advancing China's academic journal industry.

中图分类号: