中国科技期刊研究 ›› 2016, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (6): 592-597. doi: 10.11946/cjstp.201604050276

• 质量建设 • 上一篇    下一篇

学术研究成果同行评议模式的分析与研究

黄雪梅1),张红1),张晓2)   

  1. 1) 天津师范大学图书馆,天津西青区宾水西道393号 300387
    2) 天津师范大学管理学院,天津西青区宾水西道393号 300387
  • 收稿日期:2016-04-05 修回日期:2016-05-18 出版日期:2016-06-15 发布日期:2016-06-15
  • 作者简介:黄雪梅(ORCID:0000-0002-5065-7532),硕士,研究馆员,E-mail: huangxm_tjnul@126.com|张红,大学本科,馆员|张晓,在读硕士。
  • 基金资助:
    天津市哲学社会科学规划项目“京津冀地区高校图书馆开放获取资源合作建设与管理模式研究”(TJTQ15-009)

Analysis and research of the peer-reviewed mode of academic research achievements

HUANG Xuemei1),ZHANG Hong1),ZHANG Xiao2)   

  1. 1) Library of Tianjin Normal University, 393 Binshuixi Road, Xiqing District, Tianjin 300387, China
    2) School of Management, Tianjin Normal University, 393 Binshuixi Road, Xiqing District, Tianjin 300387, China
  • Received:2016-04-05 Revised:2016-05-18 Online:2016-06-15 Published:2016-06-15

摘要:

【目的】研究学术研究成果同行评议不同模式,探讨在开放获取发展过程中如何促进研究者之间的交流和学术成果的快速传播。【方法】对国外同行评议的几种模式进行分析研究,介绍了这些同行评议模式的特点、流程、管理方法等,并对基于网络的开放的同行评议模式存在的问题进行了归纳和总结。【结果】开放的同行评议模式加强作者和评议者之间的交流和沟通,推进学术研究成果的快速出版。【结论】随着开放获取的出现和发展,开放的同行评议模式将成为学术研究成果评议方法的一种补充。

关键词: 开放获取, 同行评议, 学术研究

Abstract:

[Purposes] This paper studies different peer-reviewed modes of academic research achievements, discusses how to promote the communication between researchers and the rapid spread of academic achievements in the development of open access.[Methods] This paper introduced several peer-reviewed modes abroad including their characteristics, processes and management methods etc., and summarized the existing problems.[Findings] Peer-reviewed modes strengthen the communication between authors and reviewers, promote academic research achievements to be published quickly.[Conclusions] With the development of open access,the open peer-reviewed model will become the supplement of the academic research achievement appraisal method.

Key words: Open access, Peer review, Academic research