中国科技期刊研究 ›› 2019, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (5): 512-517.doi: 10.11946/cjstp.201902210111

• 能力建设 • 上一篇    下一篇

科技期刊联合编辑部编辑岗位绩效评价管理实践

商丽娜,张慧敏,张春丽,闫敏华,宋晓林,罗玲,王景   

  1. 中国科学院东北地理与农业生态研究所期刊编辑部,吉林省长春市盛北大街4888号 130102
  • 收稿日期:2019-02-21 修回日期:2019-03-26 出版日期:2019-05-15 发布日期:2019-05-31
  • 作者简介:商丽娜(ORCID:0000-0002-3510-7831),博士,副编审,E-mail: shanglina@iga.ac.cn|张慧敏,博士,副编审|张春丽,博士,副编审|闫敏华,博士,编审|宋晓林,博士,编辑|罗 玲,博士,编辑|王 景,硕士,编辑
  • 基金资助:
    中国科学院期刊改革发展经费“东北地理与农业生态研究所期刊整合发展项目”

Performance evaluation system for academic editors in united editorial department of scientific journals

SHANG Lina,ZHANG Huimin,ZHANG Chunli,YAN Minhua,SONG Xiaolin,LUO Ling,WANG Jing   

  1. Editorial Department of Northeast Institute of Geography and Agroecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 4888 Shengbei Street, Changchun 130102, China
  • Received:2019-02-21 Revised:2019-03-26 Online:2019-05-15 Published:2019-05-31

摘要:

【目的】 针对科技期刊联合编辑部管理特点,构建实际工作中科学、合理、可行的编辑绩效考核方法,为期刊管理部门提供参考。【方法】 整合分析对多个科技期刊联合编辑部的调研结果及现有文献,结合中国科学院东北地理与农业生态研究所期刊编辑部管理工作实践,总结联合编辑部编辑绩效评价基本原则,遴选编辑岗位绩效考核指标,构建定性与定量相结合的编辑岗位绩效考核体系。【结果】 联合编辑部编辑岗位绩效评价应遵循公平性、客观性、可操作性、导向性和公开性原则;绩效考核体系应对接联合编辑部主办单位的绩效考核体系。工作作风、个人能力与素质可采用定性方式进行评价;编校工作量、编务工作量、编辑个人发展和期刊发展等指标可采用定量方式进行评价。中国科学院东北地理与农业生态研究所的实践应用取得较为理想的评价结果,表明本研究构建的绩效评价方案具有可行性。【结论】 联合编辑部编辑岗位绩效评价比单刊编辑部复杂,指标体系的构建应在明确编辑岗位分工的基础上,结合联合编辑部的工作特点,谨慎遴选指标;在具体的实践工作中,动态调整、完善考核指标体系,以达到奖勤罚懒、奖优罚劣、提高编辑绩效水平的目的。

关键词: 联合编辑部, 学术编辑, 绩效评价, 科技期刊

Abstract:

[Purposes] According to the characteristics of the united editorial department of scientific journals, a scientific, reasonable, and feasible performance evaluation system for academic editors is constructed to provide reference for the united editorial department. [Methods] By integrating and analyzing the research results and existing literatures of the united editorial department of scientific journals, and combining the management practices of the united editorial department in Northeast Institute of Geography and Agroecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, the performance evaluation indicators for academic editors were selected with summarizing its basic principles, and a performance evaluation system for academic editors that combined qualitative and quantitative methods was constructed. [Finding] The basic principles of performance evaluation of academic editors in the united editorial department include fairness, objectivity, operability, orientation, and openness. The evaluation system should be connected to that in the host unit of the united editorial department. The work style and personal ability and quality of editors can be evaluated by qualitative method. The workload of editing and proofreading, editing affairs, the journal development, and the individual development of editor can be evaluated by quantitative method. The practical application of Northeast Institute of Geography and Agroecology shows that the proposed performance evaluation system is feasible. [Conclusions] The performance evaluation of academic editors in the united editorial department is more complicated than that in the single editorial department. The united editorial department should combine its own work characteristics to select the indicators carefully based on the clear division of editorial work. In order to achieve the purpose of rewarding the diligent and punishing the lazy, rewarding the good and punishing the bad, and improving the level of editing performance, dynamic adjustment and improvement of the performance evaluation system is necessary in the practical work.

Key words: United editorial department, Academic editor, Performance evaluation system, Scientific journal