中国科技期刊研究 ›› 2019, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (1): 9-13.doi: 10.11946/cjstp.201812301144

• 抵制学术不端专题 • 上一篇    下一篇

期刊编辑部在做好出版伦理防控中的责任——Light: Science & Applications的实践探索

常唯,张莹,白雨虹()   

  1. 中国科学院长春光学精密机械与物理研究所,吉林省长春市东南湖大路3888号 130033
  • 收稿日期:2018-12-30 修回日期:2018-12-31 出版日期:2019-01-15 发布日期:2019-01-15
  • 通讯作者: 白雨虹 E-mail:baiyh@ciomp.ac.cn
  • 作者简介:常 唯(ORCID:0000-0002-6142-200X),博士,研究馆员,E-mail: changw@ciomp.ac.cn;|张 莹,博士,高级工程师。
  • 基金资助:
    中国科技期刊国际影响力提升计划(PIIJ2-A-04);国家自然科学基金委应急管理项目——资助《Light: Science & Applications》期刊(61842501)

Responsibilities of academic journals in avoiding violation of publication ethics and keeping academic integrity: practice of Light: Science & Applications

CHANG Wei,ZHANG Ying,BAI Yuhong()   

  1. Changchun Institute of Optics, Fine Mechanics and Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 3888 Dongnanhu Road, Changchun 130033, China
  • Received:2018-12-30 Revised:2018-12-31 Online:2019-01-15 Published:2019-01-15
  • Contact: BAI Yuhong E-mail:baiyh@ciomp.ac.cn

摘要:

【目的】 探讨科技期刊编辑部在出版伦理防控方面的责任与对策。【方法】 采用案例分析法对Light: Science & Applications在出版伦理防控方面的实践进行梳理,并对相关案例进行分析;同时,结合对理工类期刊遇到的其他相关案例的分析,探索期刊编辑部在出版伦理防控方面的对策与措施。【结果】 期刊编辑部应做好预防工作,制定详细的出版伦理相关规范来引导作者、审稿人、编委等利益相关方的行为,并通过提供必要的接口,进行必要的检查,给予必要的帮助等方式有效提醒相关方在论文写作、投稿、审稿、稿件处理等方面注意遵循伦理规范,严守学术诚信。【结论】 期刊编辑部在出版伦理防控方面应承担不可推卸的责任,应从政策上规范,技术上限制、警示。科学、客观地处理涉及出版伦理的事件,保持科学研究和学术交流的纯净。

关键词: 出版伦理, 科技期刊, 学术诚信, 学术不端, Light: Science & Applications

Abstract:

[Purposes] This study aims to explore the responsibilities and strategies that academic journals should take to avoid any violation on publication ethics. [Methods] Case analysis is used in this study. The practice and some cases from Light: Science & Applications and other journals were analyzed. [Findings] Journals should take actions. A detailed policy should be given to let relative participants (authors, reviewers, editors, and others) know what can be done and how to do. Besides, technical support (such as some necessary setting in manuscript tracking system), regular check on ethic aspects, and necessary assistance are helpful for all participants to obey publication ethics during writing, submission, manuscript review, and manuscript processing. [Conclusions] Academic journals are responsible and should take actions in advance to avoid any violation on publication ethics. They should also process any issue on publication ethics objectively and fairly. By this means it is possible to promote and keep pure scientific research and academic communication.

Key words: Publication ethics, Scientific journal, Academic integrity, Academic misconduct, Light: Science & Applications