中国科技期刊研究 ›› 2018, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (8): 813-821.doi: 10.11946/cjstp.201803060184

• 数字出版 • 上一篇    下一篇

科技期刊媒体融合出版现状与数字版权保护及建设思考

孙婧1),管青山1),段立晖2),王尧3),周康4)()   

  1. 1) 南京医科大学附属脑科医院《临床神经病学杂志》编辑部,江苏省南京市广州路264号 210029
    2) 南京总医院干部神经内科,江苏省南京市中山东路305号 210002
    3) 南京医科大学附属脑科医院《临床神经外科杂志》编辑部,江苏省南京市广州路264号 210029
    4) 北京印刷学院,北京市大兴区兴华大街(二段)1号 102600
  • 收稿日期:2018-03-06 修回日期:2018-05-05 出版日期:2018-08-15 发布日期:2018-08-15
  • 通讯作者: 周康 E-mail:zhoukang@bigc.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:孙 婧(ORCID:0000-0001-8956-1477),编辑,E-mail:dlh827@hotmail.com|管青山,硕士,副主任医师|段立晖,博士,副主任医师|王 尧,编辑。
  • 基金资助:
    江苏省科技期刊学会研究基金(JSRFSTP2017C06);江苏省期刊协会立项课题(2017JSQKB24)

Current situation of media fusion publishing and digital copyright protection in scientific journals

SUN Jing1),GUAN Qingshan1),DUAN Lihui2),WANG Yao3),ZHOU Kang4)()   

  1. 1 Editorial Office of Journal of Clinical Neurology, Affiliated Brain Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, 264 Guangzhou Road, Nanjing 210029, China
    2 Department of Geriatric Neurology, Nanjing General Hospital, 305 East Zhongshan Road, Nanjing 210002, China
    3 Editorial Office of Journal of Clinical Neurosurgery, Affiliated Brain Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, 264 Guangzhou Road, Nanjing 210029, China
    4 Beijing Institute of Graphic Communication, 1 Xinghua Avenue, Daxing District, Beijing 102600, China
  • Received:2018-03-06 Revised:2018-05-05 Online:2018-08-15 Published:2018-08-15
  • Contact: ZHOU Kang E-mail:zhoukang@bigc.edu.cn

摘要:

【目的】 以神经病学与精神病学类核心期刊为例,探讨科技期刊媒体融合出版现状与数字版权保护情况,并提出相应建议。【方法】 以入选《中国学术期刊影响因子年报(2017年)》的29种神经病学与精神病学类核心期刊为研究对象,对其网络数据库、官方网站、微信公众号及手机客户端出版的现状和数字版权保护情况进行调查与分析。【结果】 29种样本期刊均被数据库收录出版。26种(89.7%)期刊建立了官方网站,但提供全文开放获取的期刊仅6种,占20.7%。15种(51.7%)期刊开通了微信公众号,其中3种(10.3%)期刊提供全文开放获取。手机App收录了27~29种期刊,其中超星数据库收录的15种期刊提供开放获取。网络数据库、官方网站、微信公众号及手机App提供的下载文件均未进行数字加密,数字版权保护意识薄弱。同时网络平台建设还存在缺乏个性化服务、互动性较差、同质化现象严重及表现形式单一的问题。【结论】 科技期刊媒体融合出版已较为普及,但在加强数字版权保护、打造具有期刊特色的网络平台、完善开放获取、集约化发展方面还有很长的路要走。

关键词: 科技期刊, 数字出版, 数字版权

Abstract:

[Purposes] Taking the core journals of neurology and psychiatry as examples, we aim to explore the current situation of media fusion publishing and the protection of digital copyright in scientific journals, and put forward corresponding suggestions. [Methods] Taking 29 core journals of neurology and psychiatry indexed by China academic journal impact factor annual report in 2017 as the research objects, we investigated and analyzed the status quo of their network databases, official websites, WeChat official account and mobile client, and the situation of digital copyright protection. [Findings] The 29 core journals of neurology and psychiatry are indexed in the databases. The 26 journals (89.7%) have established official websites, and only 6 of them are open access, accounting for 20.7%. The 15 journals (51.7%) have launched the WeChat official account, of which 3 (10.3%) journals provide full text open access. The App terminals of the mobile phone contain 27-29 journals. Among them, 15 journals indexed in the Superstar database provide open access papers. The downloading services provided by network database, official websites, WeChat official account, and mobile App have not been digitally encrypted on the downloaded content, and the awareness of digital copyright protection is weak. At the same time, the construction of network platform in scientific journals still exists such problems as lack of personalized service and interaction, serious homogenization, and single form of expression. [Conclusions] Media fusion publishing of scientific journals has become more popular, but there is still a long way to strengthen digital copyright protection, create a network platform featuring journal features, perfect open access, and intensive development.

Key words: Scientific journal, Digital publishing, Digital copyright