[1] |
Pöschl U . Multi-stage open peer review: Scientific evaluation integrating the strengths of traditional peer review with the virtues of transparency and self-regulation[J]. Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience, 2012,6(1):1-16.
|
[2] |
张学颖, 罗萍 . Web 3.0时代学术期刊开放同行评议的实质和审稿模型构建[J]. 编辑学报, 2016,28(3):220-223.
doi: 10.16811/j.cnki.1001-4314.2016.03.005
URL
|
[3] |
Pöschl U. Interactive journal concept for improved scientific publishing and quality assurance[J].Learned Publishing, 2004,17(2):105-113.
doi: 10.1087/095315104322958481
URL
|
[4] |
McCormack N . Peer review and legal publishing:What law librarians need to know about open,single-blind,and double-blind reviewing[J]. Law Library Journal, 2009,101(1):59-70.
doi: 10.1111/j.1747-4469.2009.01144.x
URL
|
[5] |
Ware M . Peer review:Recent experience and future directions[J]. New Review of Information Networking, 2011,16(1):23-53.
|
[6] |
Ross-Hellauer T . What is open peer review? A systematic review[J]. F1000Research, 2017,6:588.
doi: 10.12688/f1000research.11369.1
URL
pmid: 28580134
|
[7] |
Kriegeskorte N . Open evaluation:A vision for entirely transparent post-publication peer review and rating for science[J]. Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience, 2012,6(42):79.
doi: 10.3389/fncom.2012.00079
URL
pmid: 23087639
|
[8] |
Fitzpatrick Kathleen . Peer-to-peer review and the future of scholarly authority[J]. Social Epistemology, 2010,24(3):161-179.
doi: 10.1080/02691728.2010.498929
URL
|
[9] |
Mulligan A, Akerman R, Granier B , et al. Quality,certification and peer review[J]. Information Services & Use, 2008,28(3/4):197-214.
doi: 10.3233/ISU-2008-0582
URL
|
[10] |
Boldt A. Extending arXiv.org to achieve open peer review and publishing[J]. Journal of Scholarly Publishing, 2011,42(2):238-242.
|
[11] |
Hu C, Zhang Y, Chen G . Exploring a new model for preprint server: A case study of CSPO[J]. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 2010,36(3):257-262.
doi: 10.1016/j.acalib.2010.03.010
URL
|
[12] |
Prug T . Open-process academic publishing[J]. Ephemera:Theory & Politics in Organization, 2010,10(1):40-63.
|
[13] |
Bornmann L, Daniel H D. Reliability of reviewers' ratings when using public peer review:A case study[J].Learned Publishing, 2010,23(2):124-131.
doi: 10.1087/20100207
URL
|
[14] |
Pöschl U . Interactive open access peer review:The atmospheric chemistry and physics model[J]. Against the Grain, 2009,21(3):26-32.
|
[15] |
Friedman R, Whitworth B, Brownstein M . Realizing the power of extelligence:A new business model for academic publishing[J]. The International Journal of Technology,Knowledge,and Society:Annual Review, 2010,6(2):105-118.
|
[16] |
Lipworth W, Kerridge I H, Carter S M ,et al. Should biomedical publishing be “opened up”? Toward a values-based peer-review process[J]. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry, 2011,8(3):267-280.
doi: 10.1007/s11673-011-9312-4
|
[17] |
Maharg P, Duncan N . Black box,pandora's box or virtual toolbox? An experiment in a journal's transparent peer review on the web[J]. International Review of Law,Computers & Technology, 2007,21(2):109-128.
doi: 10.1080/13600860701492104
URL
|
[18] |
王凤产 . 科技期刊开放性同行评议可行性探究[J]. 中国科技期刊研究, 2018,29(1):14-19.
|
[19] |
张春丽, 商丽娜, 倪四秀 . 科技期刊开放式同行评议模式探索[J]. 中国科技期刊研究, 2015,26(11):1151-1155.
doi: 10.11946/cjstp.201507090620
URL
|
[20] |
刘春丽, 何钦成 . 开放同行评审的产生、发展、成效与可行性[J]. 中国科技期刊研究, 2013,24(1):40-44.
|
[21] |
刘丽萍, 刘春丽 . 开放同行评议利弊分析与建议[J]. 中国科技期刊研究, 2017,28(5):389-395.
doi: 10.11946/cjstp.201704270323
URL
|
[22] |
PLoS One. Journal Information[EB/OL]. [ 2017- 11- 01]. .
URL
|
[23] |
IOS Press. About the semantic web journal[EB/OL]. [2017-11-01]. http: //www.semantic-web-journal.net/.
|
[24] |
Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics. Aims and scope[EB/OL].[2017-11-01]. https://www.atmospheric-chemistry-and-physics.net/about/aims_and_scope.html.
|
[25] |
F1000Research.How it works[EB/OL].[2017-11-01]. .
URL
|
[26] |
心理学报.期刊介绍[EB/OL]. [ 2017- 11- 01]. .
URL
|
[27] |
Ford E . Open peer review at four STEM journals: An observational overview[J]. F1000Research, 2015,4(6):1-15.
|
[28] |
Binfield P . PLoS One:New approaches and initiatives in the evolution of the academic journal[J]. Against the Grain, 2009,21(3):24.
|
[29] |
Janowicz K, Hitzler P. Open and transparent:The review process of the semantic web journal[J]. Learned Publishing, 2012,25(1):48-55.
doi: 10.1087/20120107
URL
|
[30] |
张学新 . 用公评审稿促进中国科技期刊的快速发展[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2012,29(1):109-111.
URL
|
[31] |
李金珍, 庄景春, 邱炳武 . 《心理学报》开放性同行评审方式探索及初步成效[J]. 中国科技期刊研究, 2015,26(2):139-142.
doi: 10.11946/cjstp.201409250929
URL
|