中国科技期刊研究 ›› 2018, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (5): 431-435.doi: 10.11946/cjstp.201709300837

• 专题:中文期刊路在何方 • 上一篇    下一篇

《中国普外基础与临床杂志》431篇疑似第三方代投稿件的特征分析

罗云梅1),蒲素清1),李缨来1)(),杜亮2),胡川2)   

  1. 1)四川大学华西医院期刊社《中国普外基础与临床杂志》编辑部,四川省成都市武侯区国学巷37号 610041
    2)四川大学华西医院期刊社,四川省成都市武侯区国学巷37号 610041
  • 收稿日期:2017-09-30 修回日期:2018-01-02 出版日期:2018-05-15 发布日期:2018-05-15
  • 通讯作者: 李缨来 E-mail:956245681@qq.com
  • 作者简介:罗云梅(ORCID:0000-0002-2661-3214),硕士,编辑,E-mail: hanmei730@163.com;|蒲素清,学士,编辑;|杜 亮,博士,副编审,期刊社社长;|胡 川,信息管理员。
  • 基金资助:
    四川省软科学研究计划项目(2018ZR0257)

Feature analysis on 431 papers submitted by the third party from Chinese Journal of Bases and Clinics in General Surgery

LUO Yunmei1),PU Suqing1),LI Yinglai1)(),DU Liang2),HU Chuan2)   

  1. 1)Editorial Office of Chinese Journal of Bases and Clinics in General Surgery, Periodical Press of West China Hospital, Sichuan University, 37 Guoxue Lane, Wuhou District, Chengdu 610041, China
    2)Periodical Press of West China Hospital, Sichuan University, 37 Guoxue Lane, Wuhou District, Chengdu 610041, China
  • Received:2017-09-30 Revised:2018-01-02 Online:2018-05-15 Published:2018-05-15
  • Contact: LI Yinglai E-mail:956245681@qq.com

摘要:

【目的】总结疑似第三方代投稿件的特征,提出防范策略。【方法】提取《中国普外基础与临床杂志》自使用投稿与审稿系统至2017年7月31日投稿邮箱地址以tg、tgyx 及yxtg 结尾稿件的相关数据,并对稿件进行统计学分析。【结果】共检索出相关稿件440篇,逐篇阅读稿件,综合各方面特征,最终将431篇稿件纳入统计学分析。分析结果表明:第三方代投形势严峻,在投稿时无针对性,广投、滥投;论文的著作权归属不明确,且投稿者联系电话归属地和单位所在地往往不一致。【结论】编辑需不断提升自身素养,多角度查证疑似第三方代投稿件。

关键词: 学术不端, 第三方代投稿件, 电子邮箱地址, 防范策略

Abstract:

[Purposes] This study aims to sum up the features of papers submitted by the third party, and propose preventive strategies. [Methods] Data of papers which were submitted by the third party based on certain characteristics, such as ending with tg, tgyx, and yxtg in the E-mail addresses were collected to analyze the features, and the deadline was July 31, 2017. [Findings] A total of 431 papers were enrolled while the other 9 papers were excluded after comprehensive evaluation. The analysis results show the situation of papers submitted by the third party is severe. The third party submits papers without any definite purposes, so its behavior involves a lot of journals. In addition, there are no signed authors in papers, and the location sites of telephone numbers are often inconsistent with the location sites of affiliations registered in the system. [Conclusions] For distinguishing the papers submitted by the third part from normal papers, the editors should constantly upgrade their attainments and find various evidence.

Key words: Academic misconduct, Papers submitted by the third party, E-mail address, Preventive strategy