Abstract:

[Purposes] This paper aims to explore the integrated development path for the deeply integrated publishing of scientific journal groups in China. [Methods] With questionnaires and literature research, we investigated the integrated publishing of typical journal groups in China and abroad and comparatively analyzed the integration of scientific journal groups in China in terms of content, channels, platforms, operations, and management. [Findings] The transformation for the integration of scientific journal groups has been effective, with stronger journal groups achieving a high degree of in-depth integration. However, the overall progress is not significant enough, and development remains highly uneven. [Conclusions] Scientific journal groups should stick to the concept of integrated development in the process of integrated publishing. Before top-level design, it is essential to consider the relationships between internal and external elements, and between the construction platform and operational interfaces. Implementation should follow the path of integrating media technology, content production processes, and service functions. Throughout the implementation process, the principles of being people-oriented and ensuring moderate construction should always be adhered to.

Key words: Scientific journal, Journal group, Integrated publishing, Integrated development

摘要：

【目的】探索我国科技期刊刊群出版深度融合的一体化发展路径。【方法】应用调查问卷和文献调研，对国内外典型刊群的融合出版情况进行调研，对比分析我国科技期刊刊群在内容、渠道、平台、经营、管理等方面的融合情况。【结果】科技期刊刊群融合转型有成效，实力强的刊群基本完成深度融合，但整体上成效不够显著，且发展极不平衡。【结论】科技期刊刊群在融合出版过程中应该秉持一体化发展的理念，在顶层设计前考虑内与外、建设平台与运营端口的关系，按照媒体技术、内容生产流程、服务功能一体化的路径实施融合出版，实施过程中要始终贯彻以人为本、适度建设的理念。

关键词: 科技期刊, 刊群, 融合出版, 一体化