Abstract:

[Purposes] This paper aims to analyze the current situation of academic integrity of Chinese scientific journals and clarify the key points of the construction of publishing ethics of Chinese scientific journals. [Methods] By interpreting the literature data of the online publication status changing of CNKI from 2019 to 2023, this paper analyzed the type distribution, annual trend, discipline distribution, reasons, subjects, and other factors affecting online publication status changing of journals and summarized the current situation of academic integrity of Chinese scientific journals. [Findings] The literature with changed online publication status is mainly retracted and withdrawn, and the subjects are mainly science and technology, social science, and medicine. 51% of the literature with changed online publication status has misconduct in scientific research. Republication, plagiarism, and multiple submissions are the main misconducts, which are the focus of attention in the construction of publishing ethics of Chinese scientific journals. 20% of the literature with changed online publication status has academic errors, and 13% has flaws that need to be corrected. It is prior to strengthening the academic quality of scientific journals. In most cases, authors are responsible for the change of online publishing status, but there are also cases of publisher or editorial errors. [Conclusions] Chinese scientific journals should promote the construction of publishing ethics by formulating scientific and reasonable publishing ethics policies, improving the academic quality of papers, strengthening the similarity detection of text and pictures, implementing the standards for paper retraction, and strengthening the training of publishing ethics and standards.

Key words: Chinese scientific journal, Publishing ethics, Retraction, Academic misconduct, Academic error

摘要：

【目的】 分析中文科技期刊学术诚信现状，明确中文科技期刊出版伦理建设的重点。【方法】 通过解读2019—2023年中国知网网络出版状态变更的文献数据，分析期刊论文网络出版状态变更的类型分布、年度趋势、学科分布、变更原因、申请主体、责任主体等因素，梳理总结中文科技期刊学术诚信现状。【结果】 网络出版状态变更的文献以撤稿和撤回为主，学科以理工类、社科类、医药类为主。网络出版状态变更的文献中有51%存在学术不端行为，重复发表、抄袭剽窃和一稿多投为主要学术不端行为，为中文科技期刊出版伦理建设的关注重点；20%的变更文献存在学术错误，13%存在瑕疵需要更正，加强论文的学术质量建设是重中之重。网络出版状态变更的申请主体和责任主体均以作者为主，但也存在出版商或者编辑错误的情况。【结论】 我国科技期刊应通过科学合理制定出版伦理政策、重视论文学术质量建设、加强文字图片等相似性检测、落实论文撤稿规范、加强出版伦理规范的培训等举措，把好制度关、学术关、技术关、撤稿关、宣传关，推动出版伦理建设。

关键词: 中文科技期刊, 出版伦理, 撤稿, 学术不端, 学术错误