Chinese Journal of Scientific and Technical Periodicals ›› 2022, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (5): 602-609. doi: 10.11946/cjstp.202201270067

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Practices of innovation in peer review of academic journals and the enlightenment

CHENG Bing1)()(), PENG Lin2), DU Xingye1,3), WANG Jingzhou4), LI Ling1,3)   

  1. 1) National Science Library, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 33 Beisihuan Xilu, Zhongguancun, Haidian District, Beijing 100190, China
    2) Editorial Office of Data Intelligence, National Science Library, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 33 Beisihuan Xilu, Zhongguancun, Haidian District, Beijing 100190, China
    3) Department of Library, Information and Archives Management, School of Economics and Management, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 33 Beisihuan Xilu, Zhongguancun, Haidian District, Beijing 100190, China
    4) Editorial Office of Journal of Jinan University, 601 West Huangpu Avenue, Tianhe District, Guangzhou 510632, China
  • Received:2022-01-27 Revised:2022-04-13 Online:2022-05-15 Published:2022-06-22

学术期刊同行评议创新实践与启示

程冰1)()(), 彭琳2), 杜杏叶1,3), 王景周4), 李玲1,3)   

  1. 1)中国科学院文献情报中心,北京市海淀区中关村北四环西路33号 100190
    2)中国科学院文献情报中心《数据智能(英文)》编辑部,北京市海淀区中关村北四环西路33号 100190
    3)中国科学院大学经济与管理学院图书情报与档案管理系,北京市海淀区中关村北四环西路33号 100190
    4)《暨南大学学报》编辑部,广东省广州市天河区黄埔大道西601号 510632
  • 作者简介:程 冰(ORCID:0000-0002-0628-2585),博士,副研究馆员,E-mail: chengbing@mail.las.ac.cn;
    彭 琳,硕士,副编审;
    杜杏叶,博士,副研究馆员,硕士生导师;
    王景周,硕士,编审,副主编;
    李 玲,研究馆员,硕士生导师。
  • 基金资助:
    中国科学院文献情报能力建设专项课题“数字化科研信息素养培训与服务”(E1291117)

Abstract:

[Purposes] This paper summarizes the latest practices of innovation in journal peer review and describes the trend, which is expected to serve as a reference for the development of peer review in China. [Methods] With the methods of case study, literature research, and logical analysis, we explored the latest practices of innovation in peer review of academic journals, analyzed the trends, and proposed suggestions. [Findings] The practices of innovation in the initiator of the review, review mode, supervision of review, certification and incentives, and platforms were summarized. We found that the review tended to be non-linear, active, intelligent, decentralized, multi-standard, and transparent. [Conclusions] It is recommended that domestic journals optimize the implementation of peer review, and the supervision, certification, and incentives measurements, and establish support systems and platforms to promote the development of peer review in the journal industry in China.

Key words: Peer review, Review mode, Mode innovation, Certification and incentive, Academic evaluation

摘要:

【目的】 梳理学术期刊同行评议最新创新实践进展,把握其未来发展方向和趋势特点,为国内学术期刊同行评议发展提供借鉴和参考。【方法】 通过文献调研、案例研究和逻辑分析法,探索科技期刊同行评议的最新创新举措、分析其变化趋势,提出发展的对策与建议。【结果】 对学术期刊同行评议送审方式、评议模式、监督防范、认证激励、技术平台5个方面的创新实践进行系统性总结,发现同行评议的发展呈现非线性、主动性、智能性、去中心化、标准多样化、过程透明化的特点。【结论】 建议国内期刊优化同行评议实施方式,优化同行评议防范监督和认证激励机制,建立同行评议支撑系统和平台,促进我国期刊出版行业同行评议快速健康发展。

关键词: 同行评议, 评议模式, 模式创新, 认证激励, 学术评价