Abstract:

[Purposes] This paper provides suggestions to Chinese scientific journals in the trend of open science. [Methods] By elaborating the details of journals and scholarly publishing in the UNESCO Recommendation on Open Science, we summarized the suggestions of stakeholders and compared the differences of journals and scholarly publishing in open science and open access. [Findings] The UNESCO's Recommendation on Open Science covers direct requirements, participation methods, and indirect impacts of open science on journals and scholarly publishing. Given the opinions of stakeholders on the intellectual property, business models, and peer review methods of scholarly publishing in open science, it is confirmed that the requirements for journals are more strictly in open science than those in open access. [Conclusions] In response to open science, Chinese scientific journals should formulate relevant policies, innovate publishing forms and new services, introduce or develop information technologies, and update research evaluation methods.

Key words: Open science, Open access, Stakeholder, Scholarly publishing, Scientific journal

摘要：

【目的】 为我国科技期刊应对开放科学潮流提供参考。【方法】 挖掘联合国教科文组织发布的《开放科学建议书》中与期刊出版相关的内容,整理归纳利益相关者的开放科学诉求及对期刊出版的建议,对比开放科学与开放获取对期刊出版的不同要求。【结果】 《开放科学建议书》涵盖开放科学对期刊出版的直接要求、参与方式、间接影响;利益相关者就开放科学下期刊出版的知识产权、商业模式、同行评议等表达各自的诉求;开放科学相比开放获取对期刊出版提出更高的要求。【结论】 建议我国科技期刊制定相关政策、创新出版形式与服务模式、引入或开发信息技术、创新评估方法,以适应开放科学的发展。

关键词: 开放科学, 开放获取, 利益相关者, 学术出版, 科技期刊